2019
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terrestrial biosphere models may overestimate Arctic CO2 assimilation if they do not account for decreased quantum yield and convexity at low temperature

Abstract: Summary How terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) represent leaf photosynthesis and its sensitivity to temperature are two critical components of understanding and predicting the response of the Arctic carbon cycle to global change. We measured the effect of temperature on the response of photosynthesis to irradiance in six Arctic plant species and determined the quantum yield of CO2 fixation (ϕnormalCO2) and the convexity factor (θ). We also determined leaf absorptance (α) from measured reflectance to calcula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(172 reference statements)
2
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It reproduces observed variation in Vcmax, Jmax and stomatal conductance for CO2 (gs: Table 1) along environmental gradients (Wang et al, 2017;Bloomfield et al, 2019;Smith et al, 2019;Dong et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020). It also includes the measured effect of low temperatures on the intrinsic quantum efficiency of photosynthesis (φ0: Table 1) (Singsaas et al, 2001;Rogers et al, 2017Rogers et al, , 2019. The parameters in the P model are either approximately constant and known from independent physiological studies, or estimated from analyses of independent data (c* and β: see Table 1).…”
Section: The P Modelmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It reproduces observed variation in Vcmax, Jmax and stomatal conductance for CO2 (gs: Table 1) along environmental gradients (Wang et al, 2017;Bloomfield et al, 2019;Smith et al, 2019;Dong et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020). It also includes the measured effect of low temperatures on the intrinsic quantum efficiency of photosynthesis (φ0: Table 1) (Singsaas et al, 2001;Rogers et al, 2017Rogers et al, , 2019. The parameters in the P model are either approximately constant and known from independent physiological studies, or estimated from analyses of independent data (c* and β: see Table 1).…”
Section: The P Modelmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It reproduces observed variation in V cmax , J max, and stomatal conductance for CO 2 ( g s: Table 1) along environmental gradients (Bloomfield et al., 2019; Dong et al., 2020; Smith et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2017, 2020). It also includes the measured effect of low temperatures on the intrinsic quantum efficiency of photosynthesis (φ 0 ( T ): Table 1) (Rogers et al., 2017, 2019; Singsaas et al., 2001). The parameters in the P model are either approximately constant and known from independent physiological studies, or estimated from analyses of independent data ( c* and β: see Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before beginning each measurement, a single leaf was placed in the leaf chamber under stable conditions (irradiance, CO 2 , temperature, flow rate) and allowed to acclimate to these conditions for a minimum of 20 minutes. Measurements of the response of photosynthesis to irradiance and carbon dioxide concentration followed an established protocol [ 47 ]. The response to irradiance was measured by sequentially lowering the irradiance as follows: 1800, 1400, 1200, 1000, 800, 600, 400, 300, 200, 120, 80, 50, 30, 20, 10 and finally 0 μmol m -2 s -1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%