2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-022-03567-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TERMS: textual emotion recognition in multidimensional space

Abstract: Microblogs generate a vast amount of data in which users express their emotions regarding almost all aspects of everyday life. Capturing affective content from these context-dependent and subjective texts is a challenging task. We propose an intelligent probabilistic model for textual emotion recognition in multidimensional space (TERMS) that captures the subjective emotional boundaries and contextual information embedded in a text for robust emotion recognition. It is implausible with discrete label assignmen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance gap between datasets with known and unknown heuristics underlines the importance of training prospective DL models on multiple datasets to promote a generalized understanding of emotions. Our model, furthermore, showed an improvement in Pearson correlation coefficient values for valence and arousal in comparison to the results of Ghafoor et al (2023) and respectively to the models that Ghafoor and colleagues compared their model to. Their performance measurements were however performed on a self-created, unpublished dataset and are therefore hard to reproduce.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The performance gap between datasets with known and unknown heuristics underlines the importance of training prospective DL models on multiple datasets to promote a generalized understanding of emotions. Our model, furthermore, showed an improvement in Pearson correlation coefficient values for valence and arousal in comparison to the results of Ghafoor et al (2023) and respectively to the models that Ghafoor and colleagues compared their model to. Their performance measurements were however performed on a self-created, unpublished dataset and are therefore hard to reproduce.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…When comparing the Pearson correlation coefficient to the state-of-the-art DL model for dimensional text-based emotion recognition by Park et al (2021) , the present model outperforms the one by Park et al in all VAD dimensions (by r = 0.06 for valence, r = 0.2 for arousal, and r = 0.12 for dominance, see Table 5 ). Compared to the model by Ghafoor et al (2023) , the presented approach outperforms for the dimension of valence by r = 0.30 and for arousal by r = 0.47 (see Table 6 ). The performance is, however, hard to compare with the model by Ghafoor and colleagues as they evaluated their model on a self-created unpublished dataset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scholars in natural language processing (NLP) specifically focus on the modality of text. Their research ranges from investigating and modelling the overall sentiment or polarity in a given text [9,10] to the fine-grained detection of specific polarities attached to different aspects of a product or event [11][12][13], emotion detection in text from tweets or other sources [14,15], and other emotion-related topics such as humour and irony [16][17][18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rise of social networks, big data have been generated through user opinions on various platforms-such as Facebook and Twitter-the feelings of users being entered into these sources via texts, making these sources and their analyses crucial for learning about user emotions and behavior. Different models have been used to solve this problem, including deterministic models with continuous fine-grained alternatives for affective text analysis, and dimensional models with supervised or unsupervised classification approaches-such as deep-learning techniques and machinelearning techniques [18]. In other words, we can group textual emotion recognition methods into four categories-that is, keyword-based, lexicon-based, machine-learning-based, and hybrid methods.…”
Section: ) Textual Emotion Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%