1936
DOI: 10.1038/137780b0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terminology of Relative Growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
360
0
8

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 589 publications
(388 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
360
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Crown diameter was regressed against stem diameter using an allometric power relation (Huxley and Teissier 1936): CD = CD int dbh CDslo , where CD is crown diameter (m), CD int is the crown diameter intercept (for trees of 1-cm dbh) and CD slo represents the crown diameter ''slope'' (i.e., the diameter exponent or scaling component). The power relation for crown length is CL = CL int dbh CLslo , where CL int represents the crown length intercept (for trees of 1-cm dbh) and CL slo is the crown length ''slope'' (i.e., the diameter exponent or scaling component).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crown diameter was regressed against stem diameter using an allometric power relation (Huxley and Teissier 1936): CD = CD int dbh CDslo , where CD is crown diameter (m), CD int is the crown diameter intercept (for trees of 1-cm dbh) and CD slo represents the crown diameter ''slope'' (i.e., the diameter exponent or scaling component). The power relation for crown length is CL = CL int dbh CLslo , where CL int represents the crown length intercept (for trees of 1-cm dbh) and CL slo is the crown length ''slope'' (i.e., the diameter exponent or scaling component).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly used shape metrics, such as maximal height and the width, do not represent the geometry of a structure in any detailed, or in an unambiguous way, and do not lend themselves well to interpretive visualizations of shape variation [1,12]. In addition, many biological hypotheses are concerned with allometry, or correlations between the overall size of an organism and the shape of its anatomy [59,61,41], and so e↵ectively separating an object's relative scale from its shape is an important consideration. Since linear measures are often correlated with size, for example, allometric questions are better addressed by shape metrics that are invariant to size.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Morphometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Abdominal fat deposition rate was evaluated by the allometric coefficient β (beta) value in the allometric growth equation: log y (abdominal fat) = α + β [log x (body weight)], as proposed by Huxley & Teissier (1936). In order to assess allometric nature, the hypothesis was tested β=1 vs β>1 by Student's t test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%