2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-4520.2009.00239.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terminology of Developmental Abnormalities in Common Laboratory Mammals (Version 2)

Abstract: This update (Version 2) of the Terminology ofDevelopmental Abnormalities in Common Laboratory Mammals (Version 1) incorporates improvements and enhancements to both content and organization of the terminology to enable greater flexibility in its application, while maintaining a consistent approach to the description of findings. The revisions are the result of an international collaboration among interested organizations, advised by individual experts and the outcomes of several workshops. The terminology rema… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining fetuses were eviscerated, macerated in potassium hydroxide, and stained with alizarin red [ 29 ] for skeletal examinations. All fetal morphological observations were recorded in general accordance with standardized terminology [ 30 ]. As defined by the Test Facility, fetal observations were classified as either malformations (structural defects that are rare in the control population and are thought to be life threatening or of major physiological consequence), anomalies (minor abnormalities or defects that are relatively rare in the control population and/or are considered not to be of major physiological consequence), or variations (minor abnormalities, defects or alternative forms that are either common in the control population or are of no known physiological consequence).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining fetuses were eviscerated, macerated in potassium hydroxide, and stained with alizarin red [ 29 ] for skeletal examinations. All fetal morphological observations were recorded in general accordance with standardized terminology [ 30 ]. As defined by the Test Facility, fetal observations were classified as either malformations (structural defects that are rare in the control population and are thought to be life threatening or of major physiological consequence), anomalies (minor abnormalities or defects that are relatively rare in the control population and/or are considered not to be of major physiological consequence), or variations (minor abnormalities, defects or alternative forms that are either common in the control population or are of no known physiological consequence).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terms of morphological abnormalities in the present study were used in accordance with the Terminology of Developmental Abnormalities in Common Laboratory Mammals (Version 2) by Makris et al (2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the prenatal developmental toxicity study, fetal examination is expanded to include examination of the fetal viscera, head (soft tissue and skeletal components), and the skeleton for osseous and cartilaginous defects. Abnormalities are separated into malformations that are permanent structural changes that might adversely affect survival, development, or function or variations that are a divergence beyond the usual range of structural constitution that might not adversely affect survival or health, 29 consistent with that described by Makris et al 32 The study design for the prenatal developmental toxicity study in rats is presented in Figure 2, and the study design for the dose range-finding and prenatal developmental toxicity studies in rabbits is presented in Figure 3.…”
Section: Overview Of Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study Designsmentioning
confidence: 78%