Terminological equivalence and variation in the EU multi-level jurisdiction: a case study on victims of crime

Peruzzo, Katia

doi:10.1080/1750399x.2014.937566

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, given the corpus used in this study, the terminographic work may be aimed at producing either a collection of terms related to the EU legal system only or a collection of terms comparing the similarities and differences among legal systems, such as in Peruzzo (2013). development of language varieties whose main distinguishing feature as compared to national varieties is to be found in the terminology used.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The space constraints of this paper make it impossible to discuss all the types of terminological information that can be and has been retrieved from the running texts building up this corpus. Nevertheless, the study presented here is derived from a larger PhD research project by the author on the bilingual (English and Italian) terminology related to victims of crime (Peruzzo 2013), and the terminological data extracted from the corpus have been collected in MuLex (Peruzzo, 2014), 2 a legal-translation-oriented TKB specifically developed for managing and representing (also graphically) multilingual legal data. Rather than concentrating on the types of extracted data, this study focuses on the methodology used in two different phases of the terminographic workflow, namely term extraction and term management within a TKB, which was carried out by integrating the usage of an event template into the workflow itself.…”

Section: Victim-related Ad-hoc Eu Corpusmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Term extraction and management based on event templates

Peruzzo¹

2014

TERM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper examines the possible usage of event templates derived from Frame-Based Terminology (Faber et al. 2005, 2006, 2007) as an aid to the extraction and management of legal terminology embedded in the multi-level legal system of the European Union. The method proposed here, which combines semi-automatic term extraction and a simplified event template containing six categories, is applied to an English corpus of EU texts focusing on victims of crime and their rights. Such a combination allows for the extraction of category-relevant terminological units and additional information, which can then be used for populating a terminological knowledge base organised on the basis of the same event template, but which also employs additional classification criteria to account for the multidimensionality encountered in the corpus

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Victim-related Ad-hoc Eu Corpusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Term extraction and management based on event templates

Peruzzo¹

2014

TERM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Не є виключенням і наукові доробки західноєвропейських дослідників, що присвячені цій тематиці. Зокрема, К. Перузо дослідила еквівалентність термінології у європейському, британському та італійському кримінальному законодавстві [2]. С. Рожковський, І. Плисецька присвятили своє дослідження визначенню підходів до застосування юридичної термінології [3, с.…”

Section: літературний оглядunclassified

Features of the use of legal terminology in the countries of the European Union

Lazariev¹

2021

SR: JS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article examines the issue of the peculiarities of the use of legal terminology in the countries of the European Union. It is emphasized, that the reform of domestic legislation and its approximation to world standards requires thorough research of European legislation. In particular, the cornerstone of today's challenge is the proper use and common approaches to the use of legal terminology. That is why theoretical research on the peculiarities of the use of legal terminology in the legislation of the European Union is necessary to properly improve domestic legislation and avoid mistakes and misunderstandings in the future. Emphasis is placed on the fact that domestic and foreign researchers have not developed a unified approach to understanding the term "terminology". That is why this term is used in three different meanings. It is also noted, that the category "term" is not new and has been in the field of view of researchers for a long time, but its direct study has only recently begun. It is noted, that legal terminology is considered as technical, i.e.it is the most noticeable and striking linguistic feature of legal language. In this sense, legal terminology is used to denote concepts that belong to the legal field. It is emphasized that, in contrast to the systemic languages, used in national texts, the European Union resorts to a form of "cultural communication", governed by multilingualism. Such communication is considered cultural because it is not rooted in any of the national cultures of the EU Member States. Legal acts, adopted by the EU institutions, which are to be applied and enforced in all Member States, must avoid cultural specificities and, therefore, the concepts or terminology specific to any one national legal system must be used with caution

show abstract

“…Dat er voor vertalingen van termen door vertalers soms naar opties gezocht wordt buiten de grenzen (of afbakening) van de conceptgerichte termfiche, doet ons nadenken over de vraag of terminologische informatie ook op andere manieren gestructureerd kan worden en te verrijken is met termen en hun vertaalopties die rechtstreeks uit (parallelle) tekstcorpora gehaald wor-den. Voorstellen waarin wordt afgestapt van de visualisering van termen en terminologische informatie op conceptgerichte termfiches zijn uitgewerkt in eerdere studies (León Araúz, Reimerink & Faber 2011;Durán Muñoz 2012;Peruzzo 2013;Kerremans 2014). Het Ecolexicon, bijvoorbeeld, is een terminologisch project waarin termen en hun vertalingen worden gevisualiseerd in een meertalig netwerk van termen, een zogenaamde termenwolk (León Araúz, Reimerink & Faber 2011).…”

Section: Van Meertalige Termfiche Naar Meertalige Termenwolkunclassified

Hoe de term wordt vertaald: Vertaalopties buiten het kader van de termfiche

Kerremans

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

KOEN KERREMANS * HOE DE TERM WORDT VERTAALD: VERTAALOPTIES BUITEN HET KADER VAN DE TERMFICHEA b s t r a c t. Vertalers van gespecialiseerde teksten raadplegen vaak meertalige terminologiedatabases om geschikte equivalenten te vinden voor de te vertalen termen. Dergelijke databases bestaan uit conceptgeoriënteerde terminologische fiches. Elk terminologisch fiche bestaat uit termen (in verschillende talen) die verwijzen naar hetzelfde concept. We zullen aan de hand van voorbeelden uit een vergelijkende studie van termen en hun vertalingen in Europese bron-en doelteksten en in de Europese terminologiedatabase 'IATE' illustreren dat vertalers soms vertalingen voorstellen die niet verschijnen in conceptgeoriënteerde terminologische fiches. Uitgaande van deze observatie zullen we nadenken over hoe toekomstige terminologiedatabases voor vertalers kunnen worden gestructureerd en verrijkt met resultaten uit contrastief corpusgebaseerd onderzoek.

show abstract

Terminological equivalence and variation in the EU multi-level jurisdiction: a case study on victims of crime

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Term extraction and management based on event templates

Term extraction and management based on event templates

Features of the use of legal terminology in the countries of the European Union

Hoe de term wordt vertaald: Vertaalopties buiten het kader van de termfiche

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About