2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2008000900002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terminologia de incidentes com medicamentos no contexto hospitalar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rissato et al 35 discuss the need for standardized terminology in their review of terms and concepts used to characterize the harm caused to patients by medicines. Obviously, although the definitions vary widely, they have in common their central focus on drug-related harm.…”
Section: Concepts and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rissato et al 35 discuss the need for standardized terminology in their review of terms and concepts used to characterize the harm caused to patients by medicines. Obviously, although the definitions vary widely, they have in common their central focus on drug-related harm.…”
Section: Concepts and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Rissato et al 35 , the lack of standardization in the concepts and terms allows confusing the notion of adverse drug reaction with other types of events that occur under distinct circumstances from those in which use of the drug occurs at the normally recommended doses.…”
Section: Concepts and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the studies that have been published have issues that need to be addressed; these issues involve conceptual clarity, geographical distribution, professional perspective, and the focus of ethical aspects involved. In relation to conceptual clarity, first, there were studies that reported adverse events, adverse drug reactions, and medication errors indistinctly (Rissato et al, 2008). In relation to geographical distribution, there is a predominance of studies carried out in southeastern Brazil, especially São Paulo (Optiz, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, throughout our series, we identified poor ME results for the critical care unit (prevalence of 0.98 MEs per medical order analyzed). 24 The complexity involved in the process of medication administration has been one of the main difficulties in sharing information between institutions because the design of this process depends on, among other factors, the profile of patients treated at each institution, stages of drug administration performed by each institution, and possibility of using electronic resources. The patient is in critical health condition, which can change several times, often requiring prescription adjustments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8]24 They provide little knowledge about ME definition as well as fear of reporting mistakes among the health care professionals. There are few studies in Brazil regarding MEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%