2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(03)00692-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terminal suturing of Gondwana and the onset of the Ross–Delamerian Orogeny: the cause and effect of an Early Cambrian reconfiguration of plate motions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
143
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
143
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Vaughan (1995;see also Vaughan & Livermore 2005) proposed that panPacific margin tectonic and metamorphic effects were a response to major plate reorganization associated with an increased spreading rate in the Pacific during the mid-Cretaceous (Sutherland & Hollis 2001). Cawood & Buchan (2007) highlighted evidence for deformation, mountain building and resultant crustal growth in accretionary orogens during phases of supercontinent assembly (Boger & Miller 2004;Foden et al 2006). They undertook a detailed analysis of the timing of collisional orogenesis associated with supercontinent assembly compared with that for accretionary orogenesis along the margins of a supercontinent.…”
Section: Plate Reorganizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaughan (1995;see also Vaughan & Livermore 2005) proposed that panPacific margin tectonic and metamorphic effects were a response to major plate reorganization associated with an increased spreading rate in the Pacific during the mid-Cretaceous (Sutherland & Hollis 2001). Cawood & Buchan (2007) highlighted evidence for deformation, mountain building and resultant crustal growth in accretionary orogens during phases of supercontinent assembly (Boger & Miller 2004;Foden et al 2006). They undertook a detailed analysis of the timing of collisional orogenesis associated with supercontinent assembly compared with that for accretionary orogenesis along the margins of a supercontinent.…”
Section: Plate Reorganizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such models require extrapolation of the Pan-African orogens under the Antarctic ice sheet to define the size and shape of inferred Australo-Antarctic, Indo-Antarctic and AfricanAntarctic blocks that assembled at c. 0.5 Ga to form East Gondwana. Boger et al (2001), Fitzsimons (2003), Boger & Miller (2004) and Boger (2011) have used the geological evidence available from the sparse Antarctic outcrop to speculate on potential pathways for these orogens under the ice (Fig. 6b).…”
Section: Joining the Dotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two possible paths have been proposed for a Pan-African orogen linking the Prydz-Denman region to the Shackleton Range. Boger et al (2001), Boger & Miller (2004) and Boger (2011) suggested it might pass through the inferred suture between the Ruker and Lambert complexes in the southern Prince Charles Mountains (path PD1 in Fig. 6b), although others have argued that this suture formed at c. 1.0 rather than 0.5 Ga Mikhalsky et al 2010).…”
Section: Joining the Dotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key elements of this extensive continental shield, formed during Paleoproterozoic (∼1.7-1.6 Ga), Mesoproterozoic (∼1.2-0.9 Ga), and Pan-African (∼0.6-0.5 Ga) crustal assembly, reflect East Antarctica's role in orogenic development of past supercontinents [Fitzsimons, 2000b;Boger et al, 2001;Boger and Miller, 2004;Cawood, 2005;Betts et al, 2008;Goodge et al, 2008]. Despite recent advances in our understanding of the ages, kinematics and continuity of various orogenic belts within and adjacent to East Antarctica, extensive ice cover and remote access make it difficult to extrapolate isolated outcrop data from coastal areas and mountain ranges very far across the continent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%