Background
Research shows variable success as to whether care provided aligns with individual patient preferences as reflected in their advance directives (AD).
Objective
We aimed to study AD status and subsequent care received in older nursing home (NH) residents deemed at risk for infections and care transitions: those with a urinary catheter (UC), feeding tube (FT) or both.
Design/subjects/measurements
A subgroup analysis of a prospective cohort of 90 residents with a UC and/or FT from 15 NHs in southeast Michigan. Outcomes assessed at enrollment and at 30-day intervals were hospitalizations and antibiotic use. ADs were divided as follows: 1) comfort-oriented: comfort measures only, no hospital transfer, 2) palliative-oriented: comfort focused, allowing hospital transfer (except ICU), antibiotic use, but no CPR, 3) usual care: full code, no limitations to care. We calculated incidences for these outcomes.
Results
Seventy-eight (87%) residents had ADs: 18 (23%) comfort-oriented, 32 (41%) palliative-oriented and 28 (36%) usual care. The groups did not differ regarding demographics, co-morbidity, function, device presence or time in study. Using the usual care group as comparison, the comfort-oriented group was hospitalized at a similar rate (IR= 15.6/1000 follow-up-days versus IR=8.8/1000 follow-up-days, IRR 0.6 [95% CI, 0.3, 1.1], p-value 0.09) but received fewer antibiotics (IR=18.9/1000 follow-up-days versus IR=7.5/1000 follow-up-days, IRR 0.4 [95% CI, 0.2, 0.8], p-value 0.005).
Conclusion
NH residents with comfort-oriented ADs were hospitalized at a rate similar to those with usual care ADs but received fewer antibiotics, although the small sample size of this analysis suggests these findings deserve further study.