2015
DOI: 10.1515/snde-2012-0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Term spread regressions of the rational expectations hypothesis of the term structure allowing for risk premium effects

Abstract: This paper suggests a new empirical methodology of testing the predictions of the term spread between long and short-term interest rates about future changes of the former allowing for term premium effects, according to the rational expectations hypothesis of the term structure. To capture the effects of a time-varying term premium on the term spread, the paper relies on an empirically attractive affine Gaussian dynamic term structure model which assumes that the term structure of interest rates is spanned by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principal component factors which will be retrieved by our analysis, denoted as pc it , will be employed in the estimation procedure of our GDTSM in order to minimize possible measurement errors effects in real rates R t (τ) on the estimates of state variables x it . As noted by Joslin and et al (2011), and Argyropoulos and Tzavalis (2015), this can happen because pc it constitute well diversified portfolios of interest rates R t (τ), which diversify away any measurement errors inherent in them. Finally, we estimate and test the GDTSM.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The principal component factors which will be retrieved by our analysis, denoted as pc it , will be employed in the estimation procedure of our GDTSM in order to minimize possible measurement errors effects in real rates R t (τ) on the estimates of state variables x it . As noted by Joslin and et al (2011), and Argyropoulos and Tzavalis (2015), this can happen because pc it constitute well diversified portfolios of interest rates R t (τ), which diversify away any measurement errors inherent in them. Finally, we estimate and test the GDTSM.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first set (see Panels A of the tables) relies on estimates of state variables x it retrieved from the data by inverting relationship X t = D K (τ) −1 (Z t − A K (τ)), following the standard method of Pearson and Sun (denoted as P-S). The second set of estimates replaces the observed values of vector Z t in relationship X t = D k (τ) − 1 (Z t − A K (τ)) with their predicted (projected) values on principal component factors pc 1t and pc 2t , i.e., X t = D k (τ) −1 (E(Z t |PC t − A K (τ)), where PC t = (pc 1t , pc 2t )′ (see Panels B of the tables), following the modification of the P-S method suggested by Argyropoulos and Tzavalis (2015). These constitute the predicted values of the following regressions:…”
Section: Estimation Of the Real Term Structure Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test for unit root tests in interest rates R t ( ), we will carry out a second generation of ADF tests, known as e¢ cient ADF (E-ADF) test (see, e.g., Elliott et al [55], Elliott [54], and Ng and Perron [91]) 6 . These tests are designed to have maximum power against stationary alternatives which are local to unity.…”
Section: Unit Root Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where denotes the local parameter of the alternative hypothesis against which the unit root hypothesis is tested. Then, we will estimate the following regression of the quasi-di¤erenced interest rates series d(R t ( )j ) on the quasi-di¤erences of the vector of deterministic components 6 Evidence provided in the literature on unit root tests of interest rates series is mixed. Earlier studies of this literature based on single time series unit root tests, such as the standard ADF test, can not reject the null hypothesis of a unit root (see, e.g., Hall et al [67]).…”
Section: Unit Root Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation