2015
DOI: 10.1109/tthz.2015.2468074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terahertz Conductivity of Copper Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate properties of the conductive layers also have to be known for reliable modeling of filter response, since conductivity of different inks varies in particular. For pure aluminum, the conductivity is a few times lower in the sub-THz band than at dc values [23]. Table I provides details of the estimated conductivity values of the printed surface for the three investigated techniques of Inkjet Brother Printer (IJ), Dimatix Material Printer (DM), and photolithography (PL).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate properties of the conductive layers also have to be known for reliable modeling of filter response, since conductivity of different inks varies in particular. For pure aluminum, the conductivity is a few times lower in the sub-THz band than at dc values [23]. Table I provides details of the estimated conductivity values of the printed surface for the three investigated techniques of Inkjet Brother Printer (IJ), Dimatix Material Printer (DM), and photolithography (PL).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table I makes The designed HFS in section II was remodeled to make the simulations to approach to the experimental measurements. The ohmic loss caused by the surface roughness was studied by using an effective conductivity [30]. In the remodeled HFS, the background material was set to be a lossy metal with a variable σ.…”
Section: Fabrication and Cold Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simulation with CST MWS and ANSYS HFSS [30], we need to consider the influence of the surface roughness of the brass plate on its effective conductivity, . According to the experimentally verified Hammerstad-Bekkadal (HB) formula [31], [32], and value of 201 nm for brass, values at 342 and 1368 GHz can be estimated as 0.93×10 7 and 0.74×10 7 S/m, respectively. As the effective conductivity variation with frequency is small and has negligible impact on the simulated S21 performance, its value used in the simulations is chosen as 0.74×10 7 S/m.…”
Section: Design Fabrication and Test Of The Fsssmentioning
confidence: 99%