2016
DOI: 10.1002/cpim.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TepiTool: A Pipeline for Computational Prediction of T Cell Epitope Candidates

Abstract: Computational prediction of T-cell epitope candidates is currently being used in several applications including vaccine discovery studies, development of diagnostics and removal of unwanted immune responses against protein therapeutics. There have been continuous improvements on the performance of MHC binding prediction tools but their general adoption by immunologists has been slow due to the lack of user-friendly interfaces and guidelines. Current tools only provide minimal advice on what alleles to include,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
140
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
140
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of T cell epitopes, we utilized predictive algorithms Paul et al, 2016) to map hundreds of potential human epitopes to account for HLA polymorphism and for the fact that T cell epitopes are typically derived from both structural and non-structural proteins and not limited to exposed regions. Here, as an independent validation of the predictions, we asked whether the predictions effectively identified the relatively few epitopes identified experimentally in SARS-CoV, restricted by human HLA, and conserved in SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of T cell epitopes, we utilized predictive algorithms Paul et al, 2016) to map hundreds of potential human epitopes to account for HLA polymorphism and for the fact that T cell epitopes are typically derived from both structural and non-structural proteins and not limited to exposed regions. Here, as an independent validation of the predictions, we asked whether the predictions effectively identified the relatively few epitopes identified experimentally in SARS-CoV, restricted by human HLA, and conserved in SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To predict CD4 T cell epitopes, we used the method described by Paul and co-authors (Paul et al, 2015a), as implemented in the Tepitool resource in IEDB (Paul et al, 2016). This approach was designed and validated to predict dominant epitopes independently of ethnicity and HLA polymorphism, taking advantage of the extensive cross-reactivity and repertoire overlap between different HLA class II loci and allelic variants.…”
Section: Prediction Of Sars-cov-2 T Cell Epitopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in a proven practical manner in vaccine development. 19,37,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] The issues of genetic polymorphism, as well as potential harmful constituents, are amplified in full-length natural proteins (Tables 1-4; Fig. 1, S1-S5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected a set of 9mer and 10mer ZIKV peptides predicted to bind one or more of 27 HLA class I A and B allelic variants, which were chosen because of their high prevalence in the general population, as previously described (10). Class I binding predictions were done with Tepitool using the consensus method (53,54). For each allele, and considering 9mers and 10mers separately, the top 2% scoring peptides (n ϭ 68) based on predicted percentile rank were selected; the final set synthesized had 1,836 (68 ϫ 27) 9mers and 10mers each, for a total of 3,672 peptides (A&A, San Diego, CA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%