2015
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.070151-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tepidisphaera mucosa gen. nov., sp. nov., a moderately thermophilic member of the class Phycisphaerae in the phylum Planctomycetes, and proposal of a new family, Tepidisphaeraceae fam. nov., and a new order, Tepidisphaerales ord. nov.

Abstract: Three strains of facultatively aerobic, moderately thermophilic bacteria were isolated from terrestrial hot springs in Baikal Lake region and Kamchatka (Russia). Cells of the new isolates were cocci reproducing by binary fission. The temperature range for growth was between 20 and 56 6C and the pH range for growth from pH 4.5 to 8.5, with optimal growth at 47-50 6C and pH 7.0-7.5. The organisms were chemoheterotrophs preferring sugars and polysaccharides as growth substrates. 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(21 reference statements)
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first and so far the only characterized representative of this lineage, which is now defined as the class Phycisphaerae and the order Tepidisphaerales (and implemented as such in the recently released Silva 128), was described last year. This is the moderately thermophilic planctomycete from terrestrial hot springs, Tepidisphaera mucosa (Kovaleva et al, 2015). Similar to other described members of the Phycisphaerae, this planctomycete divides by binary fission and is capable of degrading various polysaccharides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first and so far the only characterized representative of this lineage, which is now defined as the class Phycisphaerae and the order Tepidisphaerales (and implemented as such in the recently released Silva 128), was described last year. This is the moderately thermophilic planctomycete from terrestrial hot springs, Tepidisphaera mucosa (Kovaleva et al, 2015). Similar to other described members of the Phycisphaerae, this planctomycete divides by binary fission and is capable of degrading various polysaccharides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, most cultured and taxonomically characterized representatives of this phylum are mesophiles (Ward, 2010). Several moderately thermophilic planctomycetes were also described (Giovannoni et al, 1987; Kovaleva et al, 2015; Slobodkina et al, 2015) but psychrophilic members of this phylum are not yet known. At the same time, planctomycetes are commonly detected in various low-temperature ecosystems by molecular surveys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all of these features were reconsidered during the past few years. Their cell walls have been shown to contain a uniquely thin peptidoglycan layer (Jeske et al, 2015), representatives of the novel class Phycisphaerae divide by binary fission (Fukunaga et al, 2009;Kovaleva et al, 2015) instead of budding, and, finally, a few thermophilic and facultative anaerobic representatives were recently isolated (Slobodkina et al, 2015;Kovaleva et al, 2015). Even though no autotrophic planctomycetes were isolated and cultivated so far, members of the third class-level lineage, represented by uncultivated anammox planctomycetes (van de Graaf et al, 1995), are thought to fix CO 2 via the acetyl-CoA pathway (Strous et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA gene showed 90% similarity to Mailhella massiliensis (Ndongo et al, 2017). The OTU93 recovered in MSP pool represented a member of Acidobacteria, and its 16S RNA gene showed 94% similarity to Vicinamibacter silvestris (Huber et al, 2016); the OTU97 represented an unclassified member of Phycisphaerae and its closest relative is Tepidisphaera mucosa (Kovaleva et al, 2015) (Their 16S rRNA gene similarity is 91%); More interestingly, the OTU98 recovered from MSP pool in this study together with 16S rRNA gene sequences detected in Formosan subterranean termite (Husseneder et al, 2009) and…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The OTU21 represented an unclassified member of Proteobacteria , and its 16S RNA gene showed 90% similarity to Mailhella massiliensis (Ndongo et al., ). The OTU93 recovered in MSP pool represented a member of Acidobacteria , and its 16S RNA gene showed 94% similarity to Vicinamibacter silvestris (Huber et al., ); the OTU97 represented an unclassified member of Phycisphaerae and its closest relative is Tepidisphaera mucosa (Kovaleva et al., ) (Their 16S rRNA gene similarity is 91%); More interestingly, the OTU98 recovered from MSP pool in this study together with 16S rRNA gene sequences detected in Formosan subterranean termite (Husseneder et al., ) and Reticulitermes speratus (Hongoh, Ohkuma, & Kudo, ) clustered to a unique lineage of Verrucomicrobia (Figure e). So far, there is not any bacterial culture showing 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity higher than 80% to this unique lineage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%