2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teosinte Inflorescence Phytolith Assemblages Mirror Zea Taxonomy

Abstract: Molecular DNA analyses of the New World grass (Poaceae) genus Zea, comprising five species, has resolved taxonomic issues including the most likely teosinte progenitor (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) of maize (Zea mays ssp. mays). However, archaeologically, little is known about the use of teosinte by humans both prior to and after the domestication of maize. One potential line of evidence to explore these relationships is opaline phytoliths produced in teosinte fruit cases. Here we use multidimensional scaling an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In several cases, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) has been successfully used to accomplish this task in phytolith research (Ball et al 1999;Iriarte 2003;Russ and Rovner 1989;Zhang et al 2011;Zhao et al 1998). However, LDA is only one of a suite of multivariate statistical classification approaches that have been applied to phytoliths, including cluster analysis, principal components analysis, multidimensional scaling, and other methods (Chavez and Thompson 2006;Hart and Matson 2009;Hart et al 2011).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Phytolith Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several cases, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) has been successfully used to accomplish this task in phytolith research (Ball et al 1999;Iriarte 2003;Russ and Rovner 1989;Zhang et al 2011;Zhao et al 1998). However, LDA is only one of a suite of multivariate statistical classification approaches that have been applied to phytoliths, including cluster analysis, principal components analysis, multidimensional scaling, and other methods (Chavez and Thompson 2006;Hart and Matson 2009;Hart et al 2011).…”
Section: Data Analysis and Phytolith Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%