2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00395.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tenure and taboos: origins and implications for fisheries in the Pacific

Abstract: We present demographic, social, historical and ecological data to challenge the generalization that traditional tenure and fishing taboos constitute cultural adaptations that evolved to prevent over‐harvesting of subsistence fisheries in the Pacific. In particular, we re‐examine the seminal and widely cited arguments of Johannes (Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1978; 9, 349–364), which constructed tenure and taboos primarily as traditional fishery management tools for the entire Pacific region. While … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
106
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This contrasts with other regions of the Pacific, where higher population densities had probably depleted relatively more limited marine resources in the past, thus generating customary conservation practices and norms (Johannes 2002; but see Foale et al 2010). Hence, overfishing of stocks in the Torres Strait might not be expected to result in the application of TEK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This contrasts with other regions of the Pacific, where higher population densities had probably depleted relatively more limited marine resources in the past, thus generating customary conservation practices and norms (Johannes 2002; but see Foale et al 2010). Hence, overfishing of stocks in the Torres Strait might not be expected to result in the application of TEK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Along numerous coasts, the use of marine resources has been regulated through taboos and beliefs controlled by community elders. These informal restrictions on fishing practices acted to maintain social control and access to common pool resources (Foale et al 2011). Recently, many of these traditions have been eroded due to changing religious and cultural norms and declining interest of younger generations (Mangi et al 2007;Blythe et al 2013).…”
Section: Socioculturalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, changing needs and aspirations concerning food security and livelihoods, and the potential for economic gain, may weaken the influence of CMT over the harvest of resources (Cohen et al 2015) such as shark fins. Additionally, although CMT controls access to, and use of, resources, many managed areas were originally developed through social and cultural drivers rather than by conservation or sustainability ethics (Foale et al 2011). Thus, future shark and ray management and conservation efforts in these small-scale fisheries should be based upon participatory processes that identify and explicitly consider social and cultural factors, as well as communityspecific drivers, aspirations and needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%