Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/wacv51458.2022.00231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensor-Based Non-Rigid Structure from Motion

Abstract: In this work we present a method that combines tensorbased face modelling and analysis and non-rigid structurefrom-motion (NRSFM). The core idea is to see that the conventional tensor formulation for the face structure and expression analysis can be utilised while the structure component can be directly analysed as the non-rigid structurefrom-motion problem. To the NRSFM problem part we further present a novel prior-free approach that factorises the 2D input shapes into affine projection matrices, rank-one 3D … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That said, our method uses an orthographic camera model with a low-rank shape assumption in NRSf M. Hence, by construction, it has some limitations for e.g., our method may perform inadequately on high perspective distortion images having large object deformation. A recent idea by Graßhof et al [21] can be used to overcome such a limitation. Finally, we conclude that the clever use of organic priors with matrix factorization theory is sufficient to provide excellent 3D reconstruction accuracy for both sparse and dense NRSf M.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That said, our method uses an orthographic camera model with a low-rank shape assumption in NRSf M. Hence, by construction, it has some limitations for e.g., our method may perform inadequately on high perspective distortion images having large object deformation. A recent idea by Graßhof et al [21] can be used to overcome such a limitation. Finally, we conclude that the clever use of organic priors with matrix factorization theory is sufficient to provide excellent 3D reconstruction accuracy for both sparse and dense NRSf M.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NRSfM uses only weak prior assumptions about the observed motions and deformations and no 3D priors. Significant progress was achieved in comprehending and solving this classic ill-posed 3D computer vision problem over the last decades [Bra05, THB08, Graßhof and Brandt combine tensor-based modeling and rankone 3D shape basis formulation for NRSfM [GB22]. They recover 3D shapes up to an affine 3D transformation and perform a metric update if camera calibration is known.…”
Section: Non-rigid Structure From Motion (Nrsfm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows to focus on the 3D reconstruction while delegating dense point tracking. At the same time-even if a method can accurately reconstruct a scene from accurate point tracks-it is often not known how the same approach performs on real and deteriorated 2D tracks [GRA13a,AGS17,GB22,WLPL22]. (Only several works evaluate the proposed methods on noise-contaminated ground-truth measurements [KCDL18, Kum19, PSF20, GJST20].)…”
Section: Non-rigid Structure From Motion (Nrsfm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because the ideal number of bases is typically unpredictable (different bases occur in various sequences), this strategy is not robust. Recently, NRSfM has advanced significantly as the BMM algorithm [20], isometric priors [21], elastic priors [22], local-rigidity prior [23,24], space-time smooth constraints [25], variational methods [7], and tensor-based models [26] have been successively proposed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%