2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensor-based linear dynamical systems for action recognition from 3D skeletons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Human action recognition approaches can be categorised into two types: methods that are discrete and operate on either image [6] or pre-segmented videos [7,8,9]; and methods that operate over continuous fine-grained action videos [10,11,12]. Even though discrete methods have demonstrated greater performance [13,14], they are disconnected from real world scenarios that are always composed of fine-grained actions. This has been the motivation for researchers to focus on methods that process continuous fine-grained videos.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human action recognition approaches can be categorised into two types: methods that are discrete and operate on either image [6] or pre-segmented videos [7,8,9]; and methods that operate over continuous fine-grained action videos [10,11,12]. Even though discrete methods have demonstrated greater performance [13,14], they are disconnected from real world scenarios that are always composed of fine-grained actions. This has been the motivation for researchers to focus on methods that process continuous fine-grained videos.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TABLE IV A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PROPOSED METHOD AND STATE-OF-THE-ART APPROACHES IN TERMS OF NORTH WESTERN UCLA DATASET. Paper Cross-subject Cross-view Virtual view [34] 50.70 47.80 Hankelet [35] 54.20 45.20 MST-AOG [26] 81.60 73.30 Action Bank [36] 24.60 17.60 Poselet [37] 54.90 24.50 Denoised-LSTM [38] -79.57 tLDS [39] 92 It can be seen in Table IV, Virtual view [34] and Hanklet [35] methods are limited in their performance which reflects the challenges of the North Western UCLA dataset (e.g. noise, cluttered backgrounds and various view points).…”
Section: A North Western Ucla Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When recognizing human actions, the action representations embodying the temporal dynamics can provide a more relevant description than using static data [6]. A linear dynamical system (LDS) [7] is an effective tool in various disciplines for capturing the spatiotemporal data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A linear dynamical system (LDS) [7] is an effective tool in various disciplines for capturing the spatiotemporal data. Hence, the authors of [6,8] employed an LDS model to capture the spatiotemporal information of an action (skeleton sequence) and used the singular value decomposition (SVD) [9] or Tucker decomposition [10] to estimate model parameters (A, C). The parameters were used to build finite observability matrix O 푇 푘 = [C 푇 , (CA) 푇 , (CA 2 ) 푇 , .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%