Reconstructing Autonomy in Language Education 2007
DOI: 10.1057/9780230596443_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensions in Policy and Practice in Self-directed Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…106) to the development of learner development, persisted in the communication. The change in the role of the teacher, from the traditional notion of provider of knowledge to one of facilitator of and advisor in the learning process has also been treated by Voller (1997), and by Akaranithi and Panlay (2007).…”
Section: Teacher-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…106) to the development of learner development, persisted in the communication. The change in the role of the teacher, from the traditional notion of provider of knowledge to one of facilitator of and advisor in the learning process has also been treated by Voller (1997), and by Akaranithi and Panlay (2007).…”
Section: Teacher-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in Japan, teachers thought that their students needed training because they felt them to be inactive and lacking in autonomy (Murase, 2011). Teachers' concerns about students' capacity to develop autonomy was also found by Akaranithi and Panlay (2007) in Thailand. Thai teachers believed that students could not become independent without a great deal of support and help.…”
Section: Teachers' Perceptions and Practices Of Developing Learner Autonomymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In Malaysia, English teachers perceived their English as a Second Language (ESL) students had limited capacity to conduct autonomous language learning, and this led them to give explicit instructions as a way to develop their learners' autonomy (Ismail & Yusof, 2012). Thai English teachers had no objections to being a facilitator, but they believed that students still needed their help and support as they believed their learners could not become independent instantly (Akaranithi & Panlay, 2007). In another study involving teachers from Germany, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Spain, and Switzerland it was found that teachers perceived their students as too dependent on the teachers, taking no responsibility for their language learning and having no belief in the importance of autonomy development (Reinders & Lazaro, 2011), thus requiring guidance from their teachers.…”
Section: Types Of Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations