Tensions and Paradoxes of Scaling Up: A Critical Reflection on Physical Activity Promotion

Abstract

Background: Achieving system-level, sustainable ‘scale-up’ of interventions is the epitome of successful translation of evidence-based approaches in population health. In physical activity promotion, few evidence-based interventions reach implementation at scale or become embedded within systems for sustainable health impact. This is despite the vast published literature describing efficacy studies of small-scale physical activity interventions. Research into physical activity scale-up (through case-study analysis; evaluations of scale-up processes in implementation trials; and mapping the processes, strategies, and principles for scale-up) has identified barriers and facilitators to intervention expansion. Many interventions are implemented at scale by governments but have not been evaluated or have unpublished evaluation information. Further, few public health interventions have evaluations that reveal the costs and benefits of scaled-up implementation. This lack of economic information introduces an additional element of risk for decision makers when deciding which physical activity interventions should be supported with scarce funding resources. Decision-makers face many other challenges when scaling interventions which do not relate to formal research trials of scale-up; Methods: To explore these issues, a multidisciplinary two-day workshop involving experts in physical activity scale-up was convened by the University of Newcastle, Australia, and the University of Ottawa, Canada (February 2019); Results: In this paper we discuss some of the scale-up tensions (challenges and conflicts) and paradoxes (things that are contrary to expectations) that emerged from this workshop in the context of the current literature and our own experiences in this field. We frame scale-up tensions according to epistemology, methodology, time, and partnerships; and paradoxes as ‘reach without scale’, ‘planned serendipity’ and ‘simple complexity’. We reflect on the implications of these scale-up tensions and paradoxes, providing considerations for future scale-up research and practice moving forward; Conclusions: In this paper, we delve deeper into stakeholders’ assumptions, processes and expectations of scaling up, and challenge in what ways as stakeholders, we all contribute to desired or undesired outcomes. Through a lens of ‘tensions’ and ‘paradoxes’, we make an original contribution to the scale-up literature that might influence current perspectives of scaling-up, provide future approaches for physical activity promotion, and contribute to understanding of dynamic of research-practice partnerships.

Factors relating to sustainability and scalability of the ‘Food, Move, Sleep (FOMOS) for Postnatal Mental Health’ program: Qualitative perspectives from key stakeholders across Australia

“…Consequently, the transferability of findings to physical activity programs offered in other locations may be limited. Nonetheless, many of the issues identified by stakeholders are consistent with previous research that has explored challenges with scaling up in public health, 51,52 and thus our findings may have relevance to scaling up of broader programs. Whilst the final themes identified were agreed by the authors involved in data collection and analysis, member checking was not performed in the current study due to time constraints and perceived participant burden.…”

“…29 Further, whilst we present the data collected and results according to the four PRACTIS guide steps, we additionally report on the methodological process we took to adhere to PRACTIS recommendations in this study (i.e., Table 2). with scaling up in public health, 51,52 and thus our findings may have relevance to scaling up of broader programs. Whilst the final themes identified were agreed by the authors involved in data collection and analysis, member checking was not performed in the current study due to time constraints and perceived participant burden.…”

A mixed-methods process evaluation of a combined physical activity and psychological therapy intervention for socially disadvantaged young people.

“…The extent to which interventions may be modi ed has been debated extensively throughout the extant literature (43,44), however this study highlights the importance of not only allowing, but endorsing intervention facilitators' decisions to adapt interventions in accordance with contextual nuancesprovided such adaptations are reported with reference to the theoretical framework and effect on outcomes (45).…”

Strengthening initial teacher education programs to deliver confident, effective, classroom-ready graduates: A feasibility study

“…Therefore, adaptation and flexibility appear to be key drivers for implementation of the TransformEd program. Although the focus of this particular study was to determine feasibility, program adaption and flexibility are key considerations for future definitive trials and scale-up interventions [55].…”