Tensions and contradictions in family court innovation with high risk parents: The place of family drug treatment courts in contemporary family justice

Abstract

Parental substance misuse is a leading factor in child abuse and neglect and frequently results in court-mandated permanent child removal. Family drug treatment courts, which originated in the USA and are only found in adversarial family justice systems, are a radical innovation to tackle this problem. Unlike ordinary court, they treat parents within the court arena as well as adjudicating, and in this way they seek to draw a new balance between parental needs and the child's right to timely permanency. Family drug treatment courts have spread to England, Australia and Northern Ireland and international research has found they have higher rates of parental substance misuse cessation and family reunification and lower foster care costs than ordinary courts. Yet their growth has been far from straightforward. In the USA they have not kept pace with the rise of criminal drug treatment courts and in England and Australia their numbers remain small. The central purpose of this article is to explore why the family drug treatment movement has not achieved wider impact and to consider opportunities and challenges for its future development. To address these questions we draw on evidence and experience from the USA, England and Australia. We discuss the operational challenges, tensions between children's needs for stability and parental timescales for recovery, the 2 impact of wider economic and political change, and issues in data evaluation. We conclude that despite the promise of family drug treatment courts as a new paradigm to address risky parenting, effecting systemic change in the courts is extremely difficult.

The Parents under Pressure parenting programme for families with fathers receiving treatment for opioid dependence: the PuP4Dads feasibility study

“…For example, the PuP model fitted well with policy and practice initiatives, such as 'whole-family' support, 'family-inclusive' practice, GIRFEC, 62 'The Promise' 93 and Adverse Childhood Experiences practice development in Scotland. In England, the programme fit well with the 'Troubled Families Programme', 94 Adverse Childhood Experiences, Family Drug Courts 95 and efforts to transform child protection and reduce repeat child removals.…”

The co-occurrence of substance misuse, domestic abuse, and child maltreatment: Can Family Drug and Alcohol Courts play a part?

“…Despite the potential of FDACs to provide an integrated approach to DA and substance misuse in care proceedings, the problems are so widespread that it is care proceedings in general which need to change to provide the compassionate and more effective problem-solving approach found in FDAC. The same point has been made in the US context and Australia (129). For this reason, international TJ practitioners and theorists are working toward mainstreaming the approach into criminal law (120).…”

Reducing Recurrent Care Proceedings: Building a Local Evidence Base in England

“…This is significant because it suggests that women who have had children removed in the past can be supported to parent safely. Studies of 'early' family-based interventions linked to parent-infant mental health interventions and Family Drug and Alcohol Court (FDAC) programmes have similarly found that interdisciplinary work targeting individual needs can enable mothers previously deemed unable to parent, to develop anew their capacity to parent and to keep subsequent babies [7,29,30].…”