1983
DOI: 10.1126/science.6828870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tension Transients in Single Isolated Smooth Muscle Cells

Abstract: Tension transients were recorded in a single smooth muscle cell. The transient contains a linear elastic response and a biphasic recovery that appear to originate from the cross-bridges. A comparison of transients in smooth and fast skeletal muscle fibers suggests that the cross-bridge in smooth muscle is more compliant than the cross-bridge in striated muscle and that transitions between several cross-bridge states occur more slowly in smooth muscle than in striated muscle.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A pioneering study measured tension transients in single isolated smooth muscle cells by attaching the ends of the cell to a force transducer and a piezoelectric length displacement device, allowing detection of force generation after imposing a quick length perturbation . A series of studies utilizing this approach has led to important discoveries, including the underlying kinetics of cross-bridges , and the existence of internal load that opposes cell shortening .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pioneering study measured tension transients in single isolated smooth muscle cells by attaching the ends of the cell to a force transducer and a piezoelectric length displacement device, allowing detection of force generation after imposing a quick length perturbation . A series of studies utilizing this approach has led to important discoveries, including the underlying kinetics of cross-bridges , and the existence of internal load that opposes cell shortening .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we can assume that linearity requirement was met. In related studies, length changes around 0.5-2% of muscle length are also assumed to be within the linear range in smooth muscles [16,18,30,31]. Therefore, our assumption corresponds to what is accepted in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%