2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tension-stiffening effect in steel-reinforced UHPC composites: Constitutive model and effects of steel fibers, loading patterns, and rebar sizes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it was found that a larger embedded steel rebar (namely, a higher steel reinforcing ratio) appeared to reduce the peak tensile strength of the HSHUHPC. By contrast, there are instances where conflicting results on the tension-stiffening response of reinforced UHPC are reported by Hung et al [11]. This might be because with a larger diameter of the steel rebar, although the contact area between the steel rebar and UHPC increases, the probability of discontinuous distribution of the steel fiber at the interface between the steel rebar and UHPC is greater, and despite the presence of autogenous shrinkage of UHPC, the bond interaction at the interface between the steel rebar and UHPC is weaker.…”
Section: Tension-stiffening Effectmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, it was found that a larger embedded steel rebar (namely, a higher steel reinforcing ratio) appeared to reduce the peak tensile strength of the HSHUHPC. By contrast, there are instances where conflicting results on the tension-stiffening response of reinforced UHPC are reported by Hung et al [11]. This might be because with a larger diameter of the steel rebar, although the contact area between the steel rebar and UHPC increases, the probability of discontinuous distribution of the steel fiber at the interface between the steel rebar and UHPC is greater, and despite the presence of autogenous shrinkage of UHPC, the bond interaction at the interface between the steel rebar and UHPC is weaker.…”
Section: Tension-stiffening Effectmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Recently, the rehabilitation of a concrete bridge deck or orthotropic steel deck was widely conducted by employing a thin reinforced UHPC overlay, instead of a relatively thicker reinforced concrete layer, because the demand to upgrade the load-bearing capacity of bridge structures is rising [10,11]. In these scenarios, the thin reinforced UHPC layer is often cast in a state of cyclic tensile stress on the negative moment region, which is subjected to repeating wheel loads, and the thin reinforced UHPC layer behaves as a direct tension member, as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of uniaxial tensile tests on R/UHPC members conducted by Hung et al (2019) showed that the high tensile strength of UHPC can contribute substantially to the tensile strength of R/UHPC. The inclusion of a 2% V f of hook-ended steel fibers (30-mm-long) enhanced the tensile strength of the R/UHPC members with a longitudinal reinforcing ratio ρ l ¼ 0.9%-2.3% by 50%-100%.…”
Section: R/uhpc Tensile Membersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zanuy and Ulzurrun [ 25 ] have proposed a formulation for the tension chord of RC-HPFRC beams with tensile strengthening, but so far, no specific tests have been reported to understand the composite response of RC-HPFRC tension members. Recently, some authors tested reinforced HPFRC tension members, showing that the high tensile strength and strain-hardening capacity of HPFRC lead to improved stiffness, first cracking strength and reduced crack widths than comparative RC members with reinforcing ratios of 0.8–2.5% [ 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%