2003
DOI: 10.20855/ijav.2003.8.4148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tension in Fluttering Flags

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the wall shear stress varies significantly after s¼0.85, these observations indicates that the normal pressure effects dominate viscous effects in terms of induced tension. This is in agreement with Moretti's (2003) work which underlines the importance of induced tension in the competition against skin-friction and foil inertia. Additional simulations at a mass ratio of 0.1 show that the tension experienced at the leading edge, or total tension, remains fairly constant in the range of Re between 600 and 1000, around 0:192ð 7 1:5%Þ.…”
Section: Skin Friction and Tension Effectssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Since the wall shear stress varies significantly after s¼0.85, these observations indicates that the normal pressure effects dominate viscous effects in terms of induced tension. This is in agreement with Moretti's (2003) work which underlines the importance of induced tension in the competition against skin-friction and foil inertia. Additional simulations at a mass ratio of 0.1 show that the tension experienced at the leading edge, or total tension, remains fairly constant in the range of Re between 600 and 1000, around 0:192ð 7 1:5%Þ.…”
Section: Skin Friction and Tension Effectssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Nevertheless, we recognize that a two-dimensional nonlinear model (e.g. [12,17]), that includes additional phenomena and the full description of flexure, should be adopted when our tip deflection is as large as seen at the later time-steps in Figure 2. The corresponding sequence for the stiffer Plate 1, not presented here, shows attenuating second-mode motion of the flexible plate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skin-friction additionally couples the fluid and structural sides of the system through the tension term. In a nonlinear plate model, such as those developed in [12,17] it would play an additional, and perhaps more significant, role in driving the horizontal motion of material points of the plate. However, the main fluid force that drives the plate motion remains the pressure difference between its upper and lower surfaces, p, on the right-hand side of (2).…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of gravity and internal tension are neglected in this modelling [see Moretti (2003) for a discussion of tensile forces]. Considering a finite length L, boundary conditions will be those of a clamped-free beam, W ¼ W X ¼ 0 in X= 0, and W XX ¼ W XXX ¼ 0 in X= L.…”
Section: Equation Of Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%