2003
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2002.807231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tension control for winding systems with two-degrees-of-freedom H∞ controllers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In ideally field-oriented control (FOC), the rotor flux linkage axis is forced to align with the d-axes, and it follows that [6], [7] …”
Section: Vector Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In ideally field-oriented control (FOC), the rotor flux linkage axis is forced to align with the d-axes, and it follows that [6], [7] …”
Section: Vector Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the form of the nonlinear and coupling terms in the model are not always convenient for controller design so that other model structures, with comparable precision, are desirable. Several control strategies have been suggested to maintain quality and reduce sensitivity to external disturbances, including centralized multivariable control schemes for steel mill applications [4], [5] and an H∞ control strategy to decouple web velocity and tension [3], [6]. Also, for tension regulation in a web transport system, [7] proposed a control method based on a unique active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) strategy, which actively compensates for dynamic changes in the system and unpredictable external disturbances, [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the form of the nonlinear and coupling terms in the model are not always convenient for controller design so that other model structures, with comparable precision, are desirable. Several control strategies have been suggested to maintain quality and reduce sensitivity to external disturbances, including centralized multivariable control schemes for steel mill applications [4] [5] and an H∞ control strategy to decouple web velocity and tension [3] [6]. Also, for tension regulation in a web transport system, [7] proposed a control method based on a unique active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) strategy, which actively compensates for dynamic changes in the system and unpredictable external disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The H ∞ control was more robust to radius and inertia changes, whereas the LPV control gave better results for the rejection of the velocity disturbance. Knittel et al 13 presented a multivariable H ∞ controller with 2 degrees of freedom and gain scheduling applied to winding systems. The approach significantly improved tracking properties and disturbance rejection in speed and tension control.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%