2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2012.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tension between the corporate and collegial cultures of Australian public universities: The current status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…). However, the implementation of corporate risk management was undertaken in an environment in which the universities were also influenced by other management cultures such as public‐sector and collegial managerialism (Barnett ; Christopher ; Churchman ). Public‐sector managerialism is characterised as focusing on input‐driven and process‐driven information, as well as a centralised decision‐making management structure (Bogt ; Bogt and Scapens ).…”
Section: Context Of the Study And Concept Of Corporate Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). However, the implementation of corporate risk management was undertaken in an environment in which the universities were also influenced by other management cultures such as public‐sector and collegial managerialism (Barnett ; Christopher ; Churchman ). Public‐sector managerialism is characterised as focusing on input‐driven and process‐driven information, as well as a centralised decision‐making management structure (Bogt ; Bogt and Scapens ).…”
Section: Context Of the Study And Concept Of Corporate Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, organizational culture is always in the process of formation and change (Schein, 1984). For instance, in recent years, the collegial character of HE organizational culture has been challenged by the rise of a more managerial culture in many universities (Christopher, 2012;Keenoy & Reed, 2008).…”
Section: Knowledge Attributes and Knowledge Sharing In Strategic Allimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include credibility issues on methods used to determine key performance indicators in universities (Christensen, 2004) and their unintended negative consequences on workloads, promotions, reputations, and academic freedom (Parker, ; and Singh, ). These unintended consequences include lowering course and grading standards (Singh, ); ‘soft leaking’ of examination questions to raise passing rates (Saravanamuthu, ); and ignoring the immeasurable processes of student learning (Christopher, ). Singh () argues that this scenario reduces the student–teacher relationship to a customer–producer relationship, thus ignoring the traditional academic values of students and teachers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In identifying the characteristics, the study also critically reflects on and discusses the problems that the adoption of corporate business systems and processes might pose, which is undoubtedly a reason for the tensions. Some of these reasons may well challenge the appropriateness of the corporate culture for a university environment (Christopher, and ; and Tremblay, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%