2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/498674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensile Testing with Cyclic Strain Holding to Analyze Dynamic Recrystallization of Pure Lead

Abstract: We analyzed the dynamic recrystallization of pure lead by tensile testing with cyclic strain holding at room temperature. The specimens were held at an identical strain and subsequently reloaded, providing the strength before and after the strain holding process. The difference in strength enables factors affecting dynamic recrystallization behavior to be analyzed through mechanical testing. For instance, the effects of strain rate on dynamic recrystallization were analyzed by comparing the results obtained fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was infeasible to conduct a hot die forging experiment with equal ratios and conditions because the production equipment required for large forgings is huge and complicated to operate. The recrystallization temperature of pure lead is approximately −17 °C [ 23 ]. The deformation flow behavior at room temperature is similar to that of carbon steels above recrystallization temperatures, such as that of 42CrMo4.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Model and Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was infeasible to conduct a hot die forging experiment with equal ratios and conditions because the production equipment required for large forgings is huge and complicated to operate. The recrystallization temperature of pure lead is approximately −17 °C [ 23 ]. The deformation flow behavior at room temperature is similar to that of carbon steels above recrystallization temperatures, such as that of 42CrMo4.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Model and Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%