2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gete.2021.100303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensile strength of a compacted vegetated soil: Laboratory results and reinforcement interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it is possible to see, minor effects of vegetation on soil friction angle were observed, while roots contributed to increase the cohesion term. Friction values were in line with those observed in the same soil subjected to other stress paths [14,30]. The calibrated γ parameter was far below the 1.2 evaluated by [31] and inferred from backanalysis on landslide vegetated scarps (where roots have been potentially subjected to larger deformations than in triaxial compressions).…”
Section: Reinforcement Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…As it is possible to see, minor effects of vegetation on soil friction angle were observed, while roots contributed to increase the cohesion term. Friction values were in line with those observed in the same soil subjected to other stress paths [14,30]. The calibrated γ parameter was far below the 1.2 evaluated by [31] and inferred from backanalysis on landslide vegetated scarps (where roots have been potentially subjected to larger deformations than in triaxial compressions).…”
Section: Reinforcement Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…c'r = 0.3 σt,r RAR 2 which resulted in 63 kPa in the first 0.3 m from the ground surface and 17 kPa between 0.3 and 1.0 m depth. Soil friction was left unvaried, in agreement with many literature studies [6][7][8][9]. The water saturated permeability variation induced on soil by roots was calculated based on correlations between RLD, kw,sat and macropore void ratio over total void ratio proposed by [13]).…”
Section: Vegetation Characteristics and Their Impacts On Soil Parameterssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…11(i)). To quantify the SU propagation from one step to the other, a SU magnification factor (SU-MF) is defined: (9) where RE i,α is the RE of an output (i) of CT-IBA at a specific α; RE r,α is the RE of an output r along the same SU propagation path of the output i. SU-MF = 1 means the same SU between the two steps of CT-IBA. SU-MF higher than 1 means a magnification of SU from one step of CT-IBA to the next.…”
Section: Measurements Of Segmentation Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigation on mechanical soil-root interaction have been extensively conducted since 1970s and are still a topic of major interest nowadays. Recent advancements include the uses of classic elastoplastic framework [5,6] and fabric anisotropy [7,8] to interpret and understand the hydromechanical responses of saturated and unsaturated rooted soils observed in the * Corresponding author: ceanthony@ust.hk laboratory when subject to different stress paths (triaxial compression and triaxial extension [3]; direct tension [9]). Advanced numerical modelling means [4,10] have also been developed to capture the soil-root load transfer mechanisms at their interface for more accurate modelling of vegetation-related problems such as the stability of slopes [11] and trees [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%