2019
DOI: 10.1080/09243046.2019.1650323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensile property evaluations of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
43
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finding literature studies that comprehensively describe such situations is still difficult. Indeed, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the only studies that considered such an aspect were those by Mei et al [25], Pyl et al [26], and Todoroki et al [27]. Mei et al [25] evaluated the tensile properties of mixed-isotropic 3D-printed composites after hot pressing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finding literature studies that comprehensively describe such situations is still difficult. Indeed, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the only studies that considered such an aspect were those by Mei et al [25], Pyl et al [26], and Todoroki et al [27]. Mei et al [25] evaluated the tensile properties of mixed-isotropic 3D-printed composites after hot pressing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tensile testing on the laminate of unidirectional plies (UD) (0° or 90°) has been widely considered to evaluate the tensile modulus and the tensile strength of 3D printed composites. In general, tensile testing conducted in the case of 0° UD composites (along printing line/fiber direction) exhibited an elongation at the break in the range of 1–5% of the strain ( Figure 4 a), whereas the tensile modulus and strength varied significantly from one study to another study, depending on the composite design (tensile modulus in the range of 2.4–61 GPa, tensile strength in the range of 27–700 MPa) [ 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Compared to CFRTPCs fabricated by conventional methods, and for a similar fraction of fibers, 3D printed CFRTPCs exhibited a similar or even higher tensile strength, but an elastic modulus four to five times lower, as shown in the case of carbon fiber-reinforced PA [ 29 ].…”
Section: Structure Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the presence of pores is currently being introduced in the model predicting the elastic modulus of 3D printed TP [ 17 ]. The tensile properties for 90° UD composites are obviously lower than for 0° UD composites, the three different kinds of interfaces being highly solicited [ 28 , 30 ]. One limitation of such tensile testing is that it provides the overall macroscopic mechanical signature of the printed structure, including the deformation signature of the matrix to a certain extent, and the failure signature of all the interfaces, as represented in Figure 4 a.…”
Section: Structure Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Printed specimens had poor dimensional accuracy and surface smoothness. Todoroki et al [41] studied the tensile and shear strength properties of Nylon/CCF composites printed with 0, ±45 and 90° filling patterns. Lack of dimensional accuracy and low quality was observed in the corners of the printed samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%