2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(01)01067-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensile properties of free-standing aluminum thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
50
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was reported, however, that the elastic modulus measured by a cantilever microbeam test was close to that in the parallel direction to the film surface [23]. The bulk property of pure Al is 65-70 GPa in general [24], but the Young's moduli of Al in the form of a thin-film from literature [3,7,11,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] lie mostly between 55 and 81 GPa, as shown in Figure 9. Outliers are observed such that the results reported by Reddy et al [7] using a lateral resonator show very large scatter from 33 to 102 GPa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was reported, however, that the elastic modulus measured by a cantilever microbeam test was close to that in the parallel direction to the film surface [23]. The bulk property of pure Al is 65-70 GPa in general [24], but the Young's moduli of Al in the form of a thin-film from literature [3,7,11,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] lie mostly between 55 and 81 GPa, as shown in Figure 9. Outliers are observed such that the results reported by Reddy et al [7] using a lateral resonator show very large scatter from 33 to 102 GPa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The reason was attributed to geometrical effects from microfabrication issues, such as the scalloping of the beam width during a deep reactive ion etching process. Read et al [26] also reported an elastic modulus of 24.2-30.0 GPa, which is less than half the bulk property, from tensile tests on free-standing Al specimens. Although it was pointed out that variations in chemical composition, heat treatment, and grain size had little influence on the result, the main reason was not clarified in their study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure that the load is transferred along the specimen's axis, a square-pinned gripper is inserted into a hole at the specimen's free end, matching a triangle centered on the specimen's axis (for design and fabrication details see section 4.2). This improves the original pin-in-hole gripper proposed in [54] or any other mechanical locking, because only a force and no moment can be transferred at a single point that is well aligned with the specimen axis. Therefore, misalignment effects are reduced to rotational effects only.…”
Section: Design Principlementioning
confidence: 90%
“…To ensure an adequate fixture, grippers combined with (photocurable) adhesives [50,51], have been proposed, while at the nanoscale electron/ ion beam lithography concepts were used [52]. Alternatives are electro-static clamping [53] and mechanical locking via pin-in-hole [54] or geometries that conform to the gauge-end [55]. However, in all cases careful provisions for specimen alignment are necessary [56][57][58][59][60][61][62].…”
Section: Design Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this version, the specimen width is around 10 μm and the gage length is around 200 μm, while the thickness remains near 1 μm, Figure 4.13 [68]. The surface micromachining concept is used; the substrate is removed to a depth of around 100 μm beneath the specimen, using xenon difluoride.…”
Section: Microtensile Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%