2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensile behavior analysis combined with digital image correlation and mechanical and thermal properties of microfibrillated cellulose fiber/ polylactic acid composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PLA was chosen because it has a longer temperature resistance when the printing process is carried out with a long duration compared to Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) material which is easy to wrap (Yang et al, 2021). The mechanical characteristics of PLA material can be seen in Table 1 (Jesus et al, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLA was chosen because it has a longer temperature resistance when the printing process is carried out with a long duration compared to Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) material which is easy to wrap (Yang et al, 2021). The mechanical characteristics of PLA material can be seen in Table 1 (Jesus et al, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dried material is then mixed with PLA and extruder to form a composite material (d). (Author’s unpublished images, corresponding to a treatment described in ref ).…”
Section: Pla Plant-based Fibers and Composite Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I G U R E 1 UV-VIS spectra of collagen: (a) extracted from skin, (b) extracted from tilapia scales, and (c) commercial.T g than chitosan(Olveira et al, 2021); the proportion of chitosan appears to be related to molecular mobility at lower temperatures, influencing the final T g of the films(Jesús et al, 2022;Tang et al, 2022); generating similar values for F1 and F3, where F1 pre-sented a T g of 78.72 C and an endothermic peak of 74.28 C and F3 values of 77.92 and 73.23 C, respectively, these being the most stable. The endothermic peaks determined by the melting of the crystalline sections of the polymers present in the formulations exhibit significant variability, where F1 at 74.285 C and F3 at 73.235 C, followed by F2 at 71.54 C and finally PCL at 60.126 C and PLA at 64.805 C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%