2020
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/445/1/012044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensile and flexural behaviour of steel materials used in the construction of crop processing machines

Abstract: This experiment investigated the mechanical properties of mild steel, galvanized iron and stainless steel when subjected to tensile and flexural loading. Work pieces of 54 samples were prepared having a gage length of 30 mm for material thicknesses of 1, 1.5 and 2 mm which was replicated three times. Properties such as peak force at break, elongation at break, stress, and strain of the materials were studied using a testometric M500-100AT Universal Testing Machine (UTM). The peak force obtained for mild steel … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the peak impact force graphs of the coated and uncoated samples with 18% EVA replacement are examined (Figure 10C, D), it is determined that the peak impact force values obtained with Method 2 are closer than the experimental data, as in the samples without EVA replacement (Figure 10A, B). The reason for this is that the samples are in the normal weight concrete (NWC) class [29]. In cases where the EVA replacement rates are 32% (Figure 10E, F), 45% (Figure 10G, H), and 56% (Figure 10I, J), the peak impact force values obtained from Method 1 are closer to the experimental values than those from Method 2.…”
Section: Theoretical Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Considering the peak impact force graphs of the coated and uncoated samples with 18% EVA replacement are examined (Figure 10C, D), it is determined that the peak impact force values obtained with Method 2 are closer than the experimental data, as in the samples without EVA replacement (Figure 10A, B). The reason for this is that the samples are in the normal weight concrete (NWC) class [29]. In cases where the EVA replacement rates are 32% (Figure 10E, F), 45% (Figure 10G, H), and 56% (Figure 10I, J), the peak impact force values obtained from Method 1 are closer to the experimental values than those from Method 2.…”
Section: Theoretical Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Similarly the flexural strength and shear strength values of the hybrid composite (234.96 MPa and 289.01 MPa) plates are also closer to that of femur bone 33 when compared to the metallic plates. 30,34 So these hybrid composites can be a better prospect in fabricating bone plates with respect to strength. The wear properties of the hybrid composite also holds good for making a biocompatible bone plate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To get insight into the strength of adhesion of the cover slide to the main slide in the presence of the polymers, the tensile strength (adhesive strength) was determined by applying a force at the tested material until it was broken down. The tensile strength is defined by Equation () 34,35 Tensile strength(Pascal)=Force required to breakasamplenormalNCrossSectional aream2. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%