2012
DOI: 10.1163/156658412x649968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tense in Ancient Greek Reports

Abstract: This paper shows that tenses in Ancient Greek reports have both an anaphoric and a shifted-indexical component. It develops a new account of Ancient Greek tenses that deals with this combination of features. Following Klein's (1994) semantics of tense, I claim that tense indicates the relation between an anaphoric topic time and the moment of utterance, the now. As for Ancient Greek indirect discourse, I argue that the anaphoric component works exactly the same as in non-embedded discourse (contra von Stechow … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… For a somehow different account of the use of the aorist infinitive in sequences of anterior events, see Bary (: 43–9). She argues that this function of the aorist infinitive is a result of its tense markers, which are ‘interpreted’, although they are not ‘morphologically expressed’ (Bary : 43).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… For a somehow different account of the use of the aorist infinitive in sequences of anterior events, see Bary (: 43–9). She argues that this function of the aorist infinitive is a result of its tense markers, which are ‘interpreted’, although they are not ‘morphologically expressed’ (Bary : 43).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… For a somehow different account of the use of the aorist infinitive in sequences of anterior events, see Bary (: 43–9). She argues that this function of the aorist infinitive is a result of its tense markers, which are ‘interpreted’, although they are not ‘morphologically expressed’ (Bary : 43). This claim is supported by the observation that the aorist infinitive can only have ‘a past interpretation’ (Bary : 43), which seems difficult to maintain, however, given the ambiguity of the aorist infinitive (see Section ). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%