2015
DOI: 10.1080/19424280.2015.1038624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tennis shoe–court interactions: examining relationships between contact area, pressure and available friction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These mechanisms are affected by other parameters (e.g. roughness, contact area, normal load, shoe orientation), which have been previously studied and showed significant effects on friction [3,7,8]. It is possible that temperature changes due to friction during sliding contacts could change shoe sole material properties, with further implications for the tribological mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These mechanisms are affected by other parameters (e.g. roughness, contact area, normal load, shoe orientation), which have been previously studied and showed significant effects on friction [3,7,8]. It is possible that temperature changes due to friction during sliding contacts could change shoe sole material properties, with further implications for the tribological mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The level of friction on these surfaces experienced is strongly influenced by the type and amount of sand used and number of layers of paint applied. The surface properties can influence the player movements and affect the risk of injury [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of using a static ink blot to determine contact area, 18 a new method was introduced in this research. To calculate the area ratio, a boundary of known dimensions was set around the wear regions of each sample after testing and photographs were taken under appropriate lighting conditions to show contrast between the regions of wear and regions showing no wear.…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,29 The use of calks to provide traction for horses that travel on hard surfaces creates a level platform for the hoof, potentially limiting abnormal hoof placement, but COF data for metal calks on hard surfaces are lacking. 5 Because the COF decreases as contact stress increases, 30 horseshoes with calks may have a lower COF than standard horseshoes, and that difference may increase as the calk contact surface area decreases. The COF increases with surface roughness; therefore, the addition of a TLTC to the road surface of a shoe might improve traction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%