Tennis Elbow 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-7534-8_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tennis Elbow in Athletes: More Than Just Tennis?

Abstract: From the earliest descriptions of lateral epicondylitis pathology, there has been an association with sport. These descriptions include a letter by Henry J. Morris published in Lancet in 1882 describing the condition of "lawn tennis arm [1]." Soon after, Major used the term "lawn tennis elbow" published in the British Medical Journal in 1883, to describe the painful condition of epicondylitis in participants in the newly popular game [2]. This makes it the forerunner of sport specific elbow pathology that now … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the player status, the mean value was 4.82 in non-athletes and 4.47 in athletes, so the higher risk of developing tennis elbow was found in nonathletes. These results align with the opinion of Owens et al, (2015) in his research, stating that there is often an imbalance or untrained upper limb muscles in nonathletes or recreational players, so there is a high possibility of the risk of tennis elbow in non-athletes or recreational players.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Based on the player status, the mean value was 4.82 in non-athletes and 4.47 in athletes, so the higher risk of developing tennis elbow was found in nonathletes. These results align with the opinion of Owens et al, (2015) in his research, stating that there is often an imbalance or untrained upper limb muscles in nonathletes or recreational players, so there is a high possibility of the risk of tennis elbow in non-athletes or recreational players.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%