2004
DOI: 10.1080/00016470410001708170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tendon graft fixation in ACL reconstructionIn vitro evaluation of bioabsorbable tenodesis screw

Abstract: Background Conventional ACL reconstruction requires sufficient tibial bone quality for secure graft fixation. We evaluated the mechanical characteristics of a supplemental tenodesis screw in cadaveric specimens.Material and methods One group of 7 specimens from 7-paired tibiae was randomly assigned to undergo tibialis anterior tendon graft-bone tunnel fixation with a bioabsorbable interference screw, using conventional ACL reconstruction techniques. The other group of 7 specimens underwent the same procedure s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14 We chose to utilize an interference screw as the control based on multiple published studies of tibial graft fixation that have used interference screws. 21,[31][32][33] The diameters of grafts for interference screw fixation (range, 8-9 mm) were less than for suspensory fixation (range, 9-10 mm) in this study. This was based on the differences in graft construction in that grafts for interference screw fixation were doubled two-tendon constructs whereas grafts for suspensory fixation were quadrupled single-tendon constructs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14 We chose to utilize an interference screw as the control based on multiple published studies of tibial graft fixation that have used interference screws. 21,[31][32][33] The diameters of grafts for interference screw fixation (range, 8-9 mm) were less than for suspensory fixation (range, 9-10 mm) in this study. This was based on the differences in graft construction in that grafts for interference screw fixation were doubled two-tendon constructs whereas grafts for suspensory fixation were quadrupled single-tendon constructs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…We chose to utilize tibial interference screw fixation as the control group consistent with multiple previous biomechanical studies. 21,[31][32][33] Our null hypothesis was that suspensory fixation of quadrupled continuous loop semitendinosus ACL graft constructs in tibial sockets will have biomechanical properties that are not significantly different from interference screw fixation of doubled semitendinosus-gracilis ACL graft constructs in tibial tunnels when tested ex vivo in porcine bone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2 of these studies, the mean BMD of hybrid fixation specimens and control specimens was significantly different, although in 1 case this was by § design. 22,23 BMD in tested specimens varied widely and in many cases was far lower than reported values for young human tibial metaphysis.…”
Section: Biomechanical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…§ Five used human cadaveric specimens. 22,29,47,50,52 One used both animal and human cadaveric bone. 34 Among studies using human cadaveric bone (n = 6), 3 used elderly specimens, 2 used middle-aged specimens, and 1 used elderly specimens reinforced with foam to approximate young human bone.…”
Section: Biomechanical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of an EndoButton to the RetroScrew increases the maximum failure strength at the tibial site from 679 to 1027 N. 35 Other potential augmentation devices which may be used in conjunction with an interference screw include the double spike plate, Biotenodesis screw, PLLA ball, cortical disc, cortical screw, and staple. [36][37][38][39][40] Graft laceration is a concern when metal interference screws are used with soft tissue grafts. Although the biodegradable screws are comparable to titanium screws for failure loads and stiffness, they cause less graft laceration.…”
Section: Soft Tissue Graft Fixation: Tibial Sitementioning
confidence: 99%