2007
DOI: 10.4000/archeosciences.772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tendances actuelles dans la caractérisation des obsidiennes pour les études de provenance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
3
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also a picture that has often been based around the site as the primary unit of analysis, when most sites have long periods of occupation and potential variation in specific phases and sub-contexts (already implicit in the phasing in the tables in . Now, however, advances in analytical techniques (e.g., Poupeau et al, 2007;Carter, 2014;Forster and Grave, 2012;Frahm, 2013) make it increasingly feasible to provenance many artefacts from single assemblages (or even entire assemblages) and to link techno-morphological attributes to provenance data in a way that has hitherto not been possible (e.g., Maeda, 2013;Carter et al, 2014;Milić, 2014;Campbell and Healey, 2016). This starts to change our approach to understanding obsidian use in the past.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also a picture that has often been based around the site as the primary unit of analysis, when most sites have long periods of occupation and potential variation in specific phases and sub-contexts (already implicit in the phasing in the tables in . Now, however, advances in analytical techniques (e.g., Poupeau et al, 2007;Carter, 2014;Forster and Grave, 2012;Frahm, 2013) make it increasingly feasible to provenance many artefacts from single assemblages (or even entire assemblages) and to link techno-morphological attributes to provenance data in a way that has hitherto not been possible (e.g., Maeda, 2013;Carter et al, 2014;Milić, 2014;Campbell and Healey, 2016). This starts to change our approach to understanding obsidian use in the past.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multitude of methods is now available for obsidian sourcing (see Poupeau et al, 2007Poupeau et al, , 2014Shackley, 2011;Orange et al, in press). Our research group has access to quite a large panel of non-destructive and partially destructive methods, including: visual characterisation, …”
Section: Methods Available Within Our Research Groupmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Enfim, dois últimos obstáculos se opõem a uma utilização predominante da datação TF em pesquisas futuras de proveniência, quais sejam: a exigência em materiais e o tempo das medições, frequentemente proibitivos. De fato, a caracterização de uma obsidiana por traços requer duas plaquetas da ordem de 3x3x2 mm 3 , o que o torna um dos métodos mais consumidores em volume de amostra dentre o conjunto de métodos ditos destrutivos (Poupeau et al, 2007). Por fim, o tempo de aquisição dos dados, as medidas das densidades e dos diâmetros dos traços frequentemente é maior, podendo facilmente ultrapassar um dia inteiro para apenas uma obsidiana.…”
Section: Proveniência Das Obsidianas Arqueológicasunclassified