2016
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20161315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ten years' trend of HIV seroprevalence among Indian pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at tertiary hospital in Dhule, Maharashtra, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
7
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
7
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly studies done by Giri et al, (2012) and Patil et al, (2016) at Maharashtra observed the prevalence of HIV as 0.41% and 0.44% respectively. While a study by Gupta et al, (2007) done in North India revealed that the prevalence of HIV was found to be 0.88%.…”
Section: Hiv Infection Was Unknown In South Eastmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly studies done by Giri et al, (2012) and Patil et al, (2016) at Maharashtra observed the prevalence of HIV as 0.41% and 0.44% respectively. While a study by Gupta et al, (2007) done in North India revealed that the prevalence of HIV was found to be 0.88%.…”
Section: Hiv Infection Was Unknown In South Eastmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Among HIV-positive pregnant women in the present study, majority, 22 (61.11%), were primigravida while 14 (38.89%) were multigravida. A study done by Patil et al, (2016) also revealed that, out of 309 HIV positive pregnant women studied, majority 166 (53.83%) were primigravida and 143(46.2%) were multigravida. These findings are also consistence with study by Verma et al, (2002) and Dash et al, (2012).…”
Section: Hiv Infection Was Unknown In South Eastmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 According to present study majority of the women were multigravida and studied up to primary or secondary in contrast to study done by Dash et al and Patil et al where most of the women were primigravida and was either illiterate or studied up to primarylevel. 15,17 In this study, multigravida were found to be more infected as they were more exposed to infection. Whereas Perry et al state that there is no significant difference between seropositive and seronegative women regarding socioeconomic status, residence and religion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…8 In comparison to other studies of Uttar Pradesh; higher seroprevalence of 0.4% were observed by Mehrotra et 16,20,22 In study done by Gupta et al in AIIMS Delhi, India, prevalence was found to be 0.88%. 21 Studies from south India by Giri 7,15,17,22,27,30 Analyzing the reason for this difference between our results and NACO data, could be different surveillance system. Present study is hospital based survey for past 11 years while NACO uses sentinel surveillance system and being a tertiary centre, most of seropositive HIV women are referred from several centers, so higher number of seropositive antenatal women are attended in our hospital.…”
Section: Dwivedi S Et Al Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 201mentioning
confidence: 76%