2015
DOI: 10.4103/2321-449x.158878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ten Years Risk Prediction of a Major Cardiovascular Event in a Rural Block in Tamil Nadu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On age wise distribution of Cardiovascular disease risk with cholesterol, it was seen that maximum (91.0%) of study participants with the low (<10%) Cardiovascular disease risk were in the age group between 40-49 years and the majority (66.7%) of study participants with high (≥20%) Cardiovascular disease risk were in the age group between 60-69 years of age and on using Cardiovascular disease risk prediction chart without cholesterol; similar trend was observed with the majority (94.5%) of the participants of study with low (<10%) cardiovascular disease risk in the age group between 40-49 years and the majority (43.9%) of the study participants with high (≥20%) Cardiovascular disease risk in the age group between 60-69 years of age. Mutthunarayanan et al (2015) [20] and Dhungana et al (2015) [21] observed the similar results in their studies with the majority of study participants having <10% Cardiovascular disease risk in the age group between 40-49 years of age, while out of the study participants with ≥20% risk, maximum were in the age group of ≥60 years of age. About a quarter (25.9% when using charts with cholesterol and 22.6% using the charts without cholesterol) of diabetics had high (≥20%) cardiovascular disease risk, while majority of diabetics had low (<10%) risk of Cardiovascular disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On age wise distribution of Cardiovascular disease risk with cholesterol, it was seen that maximum (91.0%) of study participants with the low (<10%) Cardiovascular disease risk were in the age group between 40-49 years and the majority (66.7%) of study participants with high (≥20%) Cardiovascular disease risk were in the age group between 60-69 years of age and on using Cardiovascular disease risk prediction chart without cholesterol; similar trend was observed with the majority (94.5%) of the participants of study with low (<10%) cardiovascular disease risk in the age group between 40-49 years and the majority (43.9%) of the study participants with high (≥20%) Cardiovascular disease risk in the age group between 60-69 years of age. Mutthunarayanan et al (2015) [20] and Dhungana et al (2015) [21] observed the similar results in their studies with the majority of study participants having <10% Cardiovascular disease risk in the age group between 40-49 years of age, while out of the study participants with ≥20% risk, maximum were in the age group of ≥60 years of age. About a quarter (25.9% when using charts with cholesterol and 22.6% using the charts without cholesterol) of diabetics had high (≥20%) cardiovascular disease risk, while majority of diabetics had low (<10%) risk of Cardiovascular disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…When the WHO/ISH Cardiovascular disease risk prediction charts without cholesterol were used, the least mean BMI of 21.2 (±4.3) kg/m 2 was seen in the moderate (10-20%) risk group category and the highest mean BMI of 23.2 (±4.8) kg/m 2 was observed among the study participants with high (>20%) risk of Cardiovascular disease. In a previous study by Balaji et al (2018), [17] it was seen that BMI had an increasing trend with increasing risk of Cardiovascular disease in the study participants with 22.4 (±3.1) kg/m 2 in the low-risk group and 23.1 (±2.6) kg/m 2 in the high-risk category, while Muthunarayanan et al (2015) [20] in their study observed that majority (44.4%) of the participants had a BMI of >25 kg/m 2 . These disparities in BMI observations in present study and the previous studies might be because of differences in the composition of the study population and food habits of participants of the study owing to the geographical differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Mutthunarayanan et al . (2015)[ 20 ] and Dhungana et al . (2015)[ 21 ] observed similar results in their studies with majority of the study participants having <10% CVD risk in the age group of 40–49 years of age, while out of the study participants with ≥20% risk, maximum were in the age group of ≥60 years of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2018),[ 17 ] it was seen that BMI had an increasing trend with increasing risk of CVD in the study participants with 22.4 (±3.1) kg/m 2 in the low-risk group and 23.1 (±2.6) kg/m 2 in the high-risk category, while Muthunarayanan et al . (2015)[ 20 ] in their study observed that majority (44.4%) of the participants had a BMI of >25 kg/m 2 . These disparities in BMI observations in the present study and the previous studies might be because of the differences in the composition of the study population and food habits of the study participants owing to the geographical differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] The prevalence of diabetes was 20.5% in this study, which was similar to the prevalence of diabetes as 22.8% reported by Muthunarayanan L et al in rural block of Tamil Nadu. [17] As compared to females, males had higher chances of intermediate and high CVD risk prediction. In a study done by Deori T J et al in rural Lucknow, 14.8 % males had high risk of CVD, which was more than the females, ant it was comparable to our study findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%