The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ten years of measurements and modeling of soil temperature changes and their effects on permafrost in Northwestern Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean annual near‐surface (2 cm) T s ( MAT s ) modeled with + T a + C a + P increased by 2.4–3.2 °C in lower features and by 2.9–4.7 °C in higher features after 70 years, less than the increase in mean MAT a of 6.2 °C (Table ). The modeled increases in MAT s relative to those in MAT a were similar to an increase in ground surface temperature of 0.44 ± 0.05 °C per decade with an increase in MAT a of 1.0 ± 0.8 °C per decade recorded in NW Alaska from 1996 to 2005 by Batir et al (). The model results indicated that changes in T s relative to T a were affected by changes in densities of surface vegetation and litter, so that the relationship between increases in T s and T a during climate change will depend on changes in surface cover.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Mean annual near‐surface (2 cm) T s ( MAT s ) modeled with + T a + C a + P increased by 2.4–3.2 °C in lower features and by 2.9–4.7 °C in higher features after 70 years, less than the increase in mean MAT a of 6.2 °C (Table ). The modeled increases in MAT s relative to those in MAT a were similar to an increase in ground surface temperature of 0.44 ± 0.05 °C per decade with an increase in MAT a of 1.0 ± 0.8 °C per decade recorded in NW Alaska from 1996 to 2005 by Batir et al (). The model results indicated that changes in T s relative to T a were affected by changes in densities of surface vegetation and litter, so that the relationship between increases in T s and T a during climate change will depend on changes in surface cover.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Permafrost soils underlie approximately one quarter (∼15 million km 2 ) of the land surface in the Northern Hemisphere (Brown et al, 1997;Jorgenson et al, 2001), and store a vast amount of frozen organic carbon (Hugelius et al, 2014;Schuur et al, 2015). Warming in Arctic regions is expected to lead to permafrost thawing, as has been observed from field data during the past several decades (Lachenbruch and Marshall, 1986;Romanovsky et al, 2002;Osterkamp, 2003;Hinzman et al, 2005;Osterkamp, 2007;Wu and Zhang, 2008;Batir et al, 2017;Farquharson et al, 2019). For example, a very recent field study in the Canadian High Arctic, a cold permafrost region, reported the observed active-layer thickness (ALT, annual maximum thaw depth) already exceeds the ALT projected for 2090 under RCP 4.5 (Representative Concentration Pathways) (Farquharson et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permafrost variations, including pronounced permafrost degradation due to a warming climate, have been reported for many regions, including Alaska (Nicholas and Hinkel, 1996;Osterkamp and Romanovsky, 1996;Jorgenson et al, 2001;Hinkel and Nelson, 2003;Jafarov et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2012;Jones et al, 2016;Batir et al, 2017), Canada (Chen et al, 2003;James et al, 2013), Norway (Gisnas et al, 2013), Sweden (Pannetier and Frampton, 2016), Russia (Romanovsky et al, 2007(Romanovsky et al, , 2010, Mongolia (Sharkhuu and Sharkhuu, 2012), and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (Zhou et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2016a;Lu et al, 2017;Ran et al, 2018). For the entire Northern Hemisphere, rapidly accelerated permafrost degradation in recent years has been reported by Luo et al (2016) based on in situ measurements at a point scale or a spatially aggregated scale (up to 1000 m × 1000 m) from the Circumpolar Active Layer Monitoring (CALM) network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%