Ten Rules for Cyber Security

Tikk, Eneken

doi:10.1080/00396338.2011.571016

Cited by 17 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Filesharing systems can be used to exchange any kind of computer data, including music, movies, ebooks and software. Historically, file-sharing systems have been used mainly to exchange music, but the exchange of videos is becoming more and more important [9].…”

Section: Distributed Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Real Estate and Landed Property Blockchain Distributed Ledger for Elimination of Double Dealing

Nwachukwu¹,

Onyejegbu²,

Eke³

2019

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the real estate sector of the national economy land racketeering and property double selling have risen to a higher level due to activities of malicious land agents and those that abetted their dubious activities within the government. In this paper a Blockchain of Real Estate and Landed Property transaction ledger system is developed to record property transactions in a distributed ledger that makes double dealing by the criminal land agents impossible. This will prevent the selling of properties to more than one person by land agents and double dealers and will publish transactions in a public ledger in a transparent way. The system is designed using object-oriented analysis and design methodology and the Blockchain was built directly from the cryptographic system. The result of the system development show that the system was able to produce crypto blocks which can be mined and stored in the chain to both produce the data and the reward system for the real estate industry to use in protecting itself from double dealing and from the criminals. The work is implemented using public key cryptography and Python programming language. The system will bust the real estate sector and bring to minimum the malicious activities of the land agents and their collaborators who commit crime by swindling unsuspecting land buyers and property developers of their fund by double selling and dealing on properties that does not belong to them.

show abstract

Section: Distributed Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Real Estate and Landed Property Blockchain Distributed Ledger for Elimination of Double Dealing

Nwachukwu¹,

Onyejegbu²,

Eke³

2019

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The second concern focuses on technical appliances to the social use of cyberspace, and how it could be used against national interests and governments by criminal or terrorist networks. The third and most recent concern is the idea of cyber warfare (Hansen and Nissenbaum 2009;Manjikian 2010;Tikk 2011). Such an attack can occur if there are weaknesses in the infrastructure or through the programming of viruses.…”

Section: Transnational Public-private Interaction Against Cybercrimementioning

confidence: 99%

Non-state Actors and Global Crime Governance: Explaining the Variance of Public-private Interaction

Jakobi

2015

The British Journal of Politics and International Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article: • Shows the variance of non-state actors in global crime governance and transnational governance in general, and shows that existent accounts fail to explain this variance. • Proposes a model of how we can understand the different roles of non-state actors, distinguishing normative from rationalist reasons for non-state actor involvement. • Compares different forms of current global crime governance (human trafficking, conflict diamonds, money laundering, cybercrime) to explore the validity of the model. • Shows that non-state activism and public debate are usually only related to a specific type of crime, turning a 'blind eye' to other forms of crime and their governance. • Argues that this creates problems with regard to oversight and discussion of global crime governance, exemplified with regard to intelligence surveillance via internet traffic. Global crime governance has become a major area of international activity, including a growing number of public and private regulatory efforts. Yet it is puzzling that a considerable variance exists in how state and non-state actors interact: non-state actors have been important agenda-setters in some issue areas, while they have been absent in others. Sometimes they are implementation bodies, sometimes they set regulations themselves. I argue that this variance is caused by issue characteristics: If an issue area is framed in a highly moralised way, it is likely that resulting nongovernmental activity can be explained by normative convictions, and in particular advocacy occurs frequently. If an issue area is framed in a technical way, resource exchange is central, and delegation to non-state actors becomes more prominent. A comparison of human trafficking, conflict diamonds, money laundering and cybercrime shows that this relation can be found on the global and national level.

show abstract

“…Such threats can be of various natures. For instance, cyber-terrorism can be used to create fear of violence for political purposes and as a means to gather support for violent groups (Trim, 2003), while cyber-attacks can be launched with state support to sabotage or spy on other entities (Claver, 2018;Tikk, 2011). Next, malicious criminals and activists may hack into computer systems of companies and governments to disrupt their functioning or steal valuable assets (Stouder & Gallagher, 2013;Trim, 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cyber Intelligence Networks: A Typology

Kalkman

Wieskamp²

2019

The International Journal of Intelligence, Security, and Public

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this research, we identify different types of cyber intelligence networks and specify their unique characteristics. While existing research discusses intelligence cooperation in general terms or analyzes single case studies, we provide insight in the diversity of cyber intelligence networks in existence. Based on a qualitative study of cyber intelligence networks in the Netherlands, we identify four distinct types: centralized networks, business networks, operational networks, and local networks. These networks differ in terms of their history, activities, governance structure, communication frequency, goal consensus, member commitment, and perceived results. Based on the typology, we claim that the network type influences the challenges and outcomes of cyber intelligence cooperation. Next, we argue for an expanded focus on private sector engagement in these networks. Lastly, we advocate for incentivizing bottom-up cyber intelligence cooperation.

show abstract

Ten Rules for Cyber Security

Cited by 17 publications

References 0 publications

A Real Estate and Landed Property Blockchain Distributed Ledger for Elimination of Double Dealing

A Real Estate and Landed Property Blockchain Distributed Ledger for Elimination of Double Dealing

Non-state Actors and Global Crime Governance: Explaining the Variance of Public-private Interaction

Cyber Intelligence Networks: A Typology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About