1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf02684457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ten reasons why ANOVA theory and research fail to explain attribution processes: 1. Conceptual problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been proposed by a number of writers as an alternative to the ANOVA model of causal attribution (e.g. Abelson and Lalljee, in press;Hilton, 1985;Lalljee and Abelson, 1983;Leddo, Abelson and Gross, 1984;Newcombe and Rutter, 1982;Read, 1987;Smith and Miller, 1979). Schank and Abelson's (1977) model of story-understanding, particularly as developed by Wilensky (1978Wilensky ( , 1983, hypothesizes that stories are comprehended by using a 'plan applier mechanism' that seeks to explain actions in terms of plans, plans in terms of goals, and goals in terms of certain states.…”
Section: Causal Attribution As a Process Of Deductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been proposed by a number of writers as an alternative to the ANOVA model of causal attribution (e.g. Abelson and Lalljee, in press;Hilton, 1985;Lalljee and Abelson, 1983;Leddo, Abelson and Gross, 1984;Newcombe and Rutter, 1982;Read, 1987;Smith and Miller, 1979). Schank and Abelson's (1977) model of story-understanding, particularly as developed by Wilensky (1978Wilensky ( , 1983, hypothesizes that stories are comprehended by using a 'plan applier mechanism' that seeks to explain actions in terms of plans, plans in terms of goals, and goals in terms of certain states.…”
Section: Causal Attribution As a Process Of Deductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The examples just discussed reflect the salience and consequences of attributions in interpersonal contexts. Despite the expansive and diverse domains and questions to which Attribution Theory has been applied, the theory is not without its problems, and Attribution Theory has received its share of critical review (e.g., Newcombe & Rutter, 1982;Semin, 1980). There are many criteria by which theories can be evaluated.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%