2017
DOI: 10.1111/eip.12429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ten guiding principles for youth mental health services

Abstract: The 10 principles identified may be useful for quality improvement and are likely to have international relevance. We suggest the timely pursuit of an international consensus on guiding principles for service delivery under the auspices of a peak body for YMH.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is highly unlikely that a single model of service delivery will work across the extreme diversity of this country based on geography, politics, culture and level of available mental health resources nor is it feasible to import a model in its entirety that has shown some effectiveness in another country. The principles governing transformation of youth mental health services have, however, been well articulated (Birchwood & Singh, ; Hughes, Hebel, Badcock, & Parker, ; Malla et al, ; McGorry, ) and need to be adhered to in any form of service transformation. Briefly, these principles include youth participation at all levels, creation of youth‐friendly stigma‐free services, optimistic culture of care, early intervention, focus on social and vocational outcomes, services to be based on epidemiological estimates of rates of mental disorders in youth, elimination of discontinuities at times of age transitions and linkages to other relevant services (McGorry, Bates, & Birchwood, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is highly unlikely that a single model of service delivery will work across the extreme diversity of this country based on geography, politics, culture and level of available mental health resources nor is it feasible to import a model in its entirety that has shown some effectiveness in another country. The principles governing transformation of youth mental health services have, however, been well articulated (Birchwood & Singh, ; Hughes, Hebel, Badcock, & Parker, ; Malla et al, ; McGorry, ) and need to be adhered to in any form of service transformation. Briefly, these principles include youth participation at all levels, creation of youth‐friendly stigma‐free services, optimistic culture of care, early intervention, focus on social and vocational outcomes, services to be based on epidemiological estimates of rates of mental disorders in youth, elimination of discontinuities at times of age transitions and linkages to other relevant services (McGorry, Bates, & Birchwood, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It identified the following features of a SPA: a) a single point of contact for a range of universal services covering advice, consultation, assessment and onward referral; b) early risk assessment; c) prompt decisionmaking about which team can best meet the child/young person's needs; and d) the ability for young people and parents to self-refer [23]. These goals align with changes that have been identified to improve access in Canada, Australia, Ireland and the US [25][26][27][28]. For example, the changes follow models of improving provision of mental health care by altering provider behaviour and in this model, the provider becomes the mental health service itself, and so brings mental health expertise closer to young people's initial point of contact in the hope that this will improve the quality of care decisions [14].…”
Section: (Continued From Previous Page)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single services have been developed in the UK (e.g., Norfolk Youth Service, Forward Thinking Birmingham), US (Supporting Positive Opportunities with Teens), Israel (Adolescent Health Service), and Singapore (Community Health Assessment Team). No single-service model constitutes best practice (Hetrick et al 2017), and guiding principles for youth mental health services have been published to inform the development of services (Hughes et al 2018).…”
Section: Youth-friendly Service Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%