Abstract:Background
Preclinical evidence suggested that blockade of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway might overcome resistance to hormonal therapy.
Methods
We performed a randomized phase II trial of intravenous temsirolimus 25 mg weekly versus the combination of weekly temsirolimus with a regimen of megestrol acetate 80 mg bid for three weeks alternating with tamoxifen 20 mg bid for three weeks in women with recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma.
Results
There were 71 eligible patients who received at least one d… Show more
“…A trial testing the combination of temsirolimus with megestrol acetate and tamoxifen closed early because of an excess number of venous thromboses, with a 12.5% rate of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or stroke, compared with the 5% reported rate of venous thrombosis with megestrol acetate alone [84]. However, a subsequent study of the combination of everolimus and letrozole was more promising, with an overall response rate of 32%.…”
Level I evidence exists for use of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIC endometrial cancer (positive lymph nodes), although results of randomized trials have varied. Chemotherapy is also often recommended for high-risk subsets of stage I disease, such as serous carcinomas, although prospective trial data to validate this practice are lacking. Carboplatin plus paclitaxel is the current standard regimen, based on extrapolation of data from the metastatic setting. Several clinical trials have compared adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy alone to a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy with mixed results. One of the largest of these trials, Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma 3 (PORTEC-3), has completed accrual and is awaiting data maturation. Metastatic disease is not curable. For tumors of low-grade endometrioid histology with a prolonged time to recurrence, endocrine therapy with a progestin-based regimen is appropriate. Chemotherapy will be used in most other cases, and the standard first-line regimen is carboplatin and paclitaxel. Few chemotherapy agents have been shown to produce meaningful response rates in the second-line setting. Molecularly targeted therapies such as mTOR inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents including bevacizumab have been studied but their role in the armamentarium remains uncertain. The Oncologist 2016; 21:1250-1259 Implications for Practice: Following surgical resection and staging for endometrial cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel can be administered to patients with a high risk for recurrence. This includes patients with stage IIIC disease with positive lymph nodes, and high-risk subsets of stage I disease such as serous carcinomas. In the metastatic setting, endocrine therapy can be considered, particularly for patients with lower-grade disease and a prolonged time to recurrence. Combined therapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel is the standard of care used for front-line chemotherapy. Antiangiogenic agents are clearly active, but how they should be integrated into treatment is not yet determined. Immunotherapy is a promising direction for patients with mismatch repair-deficient or polymerase «-mutated tumors.
“…A trial testing the combination of temsirolimus with megestrol acetate and tamoxifen closed early because of an excess number of venous thromboses, with a 12.5% rate of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or stroke, compared with the 5% reported rate of venous thrombosis with megestrol acetate alone [84]. However, a subsequent study of the combination of everolimus and letrozole was more promising, with an overall response rate of 32%.…”
Level I evidence exists for use of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIC endometrial cancer (positive lymph nodes), although results of randomized trials have varied. Chemotherapy is also often recommended for high-risk subsets of stage I disease, such as serous carcinomas, although prospective trial data to validate this practice are lacking. Carboplatin plus paclitaxel is the current standard regimen, based on extrapolation of data from the metastatic setting. Several clinical trials have compared adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy alone to a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy with mixed results. One of the largest of these trials, Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma 3 (PORTEC-3), has completed accrual and is awaiting data maturation. Metastatic disease is not curable. For tumors of low-grade endometrioid histology with a prolonged time to recurrence, endocrine therapy with a progestin-based regimen is appropriate. Chemotherapy will be used in most other cases, and the standard first-line regimen is carboplatin and paclitaxel. Few chemotherapy agents have been shown to produce meaningful response rates in the second-line setting. Molecularly targeted therapies such as mTOR inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents including bevacizumab have been studied but their role in the armamentarium remains uncertain. The Oncologist 2016; 21:1250-1259 Implications for Practice: Following surgical resection and staging for endometrial cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel can be administered to patients with a high risk for recurrence. This includes patients with stage IIIC disease with positive lymph nodes, and high-risk subsets of stage I disease such as serous carcinomas. In the metastatic setting, endocrine therapy can be considered, particularly for patients with lower-grade disease and a prolonged time to recurrence. Combined therapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel is the standard of care used for front-line chemotherapy. Antiangiogenic agents are clearly active, but how they should be integrated into treatment is not yet determined. Immunotherapy is a promising direction for patients with mismatch repair-deficient or polymerase «-mutated tumors.
“…In the clinic, response rates with monotherapy are modest, ranging from 4-25%, with the higher response rates often, but not consistently, occurring in patients who had not been heavily pretreated with chemotherapy [73][74][75][76][77][78]. A recent open label, multi-center, phase II trial comparing treatment with ridaforolimus to a progestin or investigator choice chemotherapy found higher stable disease rates in the ridaforolimus group (35% vs. 17%) and longer PFS (3.6 months vs. 1.9 months) with an overall safety profile consistent with prior studies [79].…”
“…No agent proved to be superior over the others. Subsequent phase 2 studies for this population attempted to improve on megestrol by adding tamoxifen (Fiorica et al, 2004) and subsequently tamoxifen and temsirolimus (Fleming et al, 2014). Reported outcomes for combinations were similar to those obtained with megestrol alone.…”
Megestrol is an effective palliative treatment for endometrial carcinoma. Some persons with progestin-responsive cancer continue on hormonal therapy for months or even years. In persons who respond to megestrol, long term use can cause weight gain and other side effects via activity of the drug at the corticosteroid receptor. Norethindrone is a progestin which has been used clinically for decades and which is without corticosteroid activity. We report three women with metastatic endometrial cancer responding to megestrol for whom a switch to norethindrone decreased weight gain with continued cancer control. A clinical trial of first line norethindrone for metastatic endometrial cancer could benefit people with this disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.