The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temsirolimus with or without megestrol acetate and tamoxifen for endometrial cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study

Abstract: Background Preclinical evidence suggested that blockade of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway might overcome resistance to hormonal therapy. Methods We performed a randomized phase II trial of intravenous temsirolimus 25 mg weekly versus the combination of weekly temsirolimus with a regimen of megestrol acetate 80 mg bid for three weeks alternating with tamoxifen 20 mg bid for three weeks in women with recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma. Results There were 71 eligible patients who received at least one d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A trial testing the combination of temsirolimus with megestrol acetate and tamoxifen closed early because of an excess number of venous thromboses, with a 12.5% rate of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or stroke, compared with the 5% reported rate of venous thrombosis with megestrol acetate alone [84]. However, a subsequent study of the combination of everolimus and letrozole was more promising, with an overall response rate of 32%.…”
Section: Molecularly Targeted Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A trial testing the combination of temsirolimus with megestrol acetate and tamoxifen closed early because of an excess number of venous thromboses, with a 12.5% rate of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or stroke, compared with the 5% reported rate of venous thrombosis with megestrol acetate alone [84]. However, a subsequent study of the combination of everolimus and letrozole was more promising, with an overall response rate of 32%.…”
Section: Molecularly Targeted Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the clinic, response rates with monotherapy are modest, ranging from 4-25%, with the higher response rates often, but not consistently, occurring in patients who had not been heavily pretreated with chemotherapy [73][74][75][76][77][78]. A recent open label, multi-center, phase II trial comparing treatment with ridaforolimus to a progestin or investigator choice chemotherapy found higher stable disease rates in the ridaforolimus group (35% vs. 17%) and longer PFS (3.6 months vs. 1.9 months) with an overall safety profile consistent with prior studies [79].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No agent proved to be superior over the others. Subsequent phase 2 studies for this population attempted to improve on megestrol by adding tamoxifen (Fiorica et al, 2004) and subsequently tamoxifen and temsirolimus (Fleming et al, 2014). Reported outcomes for combinations were similar to those obtained with megestrol alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%