2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11325-021-02449-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporomandibular disorders in patients with polysomnographic diagnosis of sleep bruxism: a case–control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study's findings demonstrated that subjects with <5 years of practice experience were not treating subjects with TMDs, which can be attributed to their insufficient skills and knowledge of the treatment of TMDs compared to practitioners with more experience. These results were consistent with the studies of (SAJJANAR et al 2021) and (Sinclair et al 2022), where the authors reported that required efforts are not put in by the practitioners newer in practice to assess the etiology of TMDs and to diagnose TMDs; they rather decide to not treat the subject and refer them to a higher center or to the specialist that could treat TMDs. However, practitioners with more experience, as in the present study, of 5-10 years or >10 years, owing to more encounters of practitioners with TMDs, require clinicians to treat subjects with TMDs and increase their attendance in CDEs focused on TMDs, increasing their confidence and knowledge in treating subjects with TMDs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The current study's findings demonstrated that subjects with <5 years of practice experience were not treating subjects with TMDs, which can be attributed to their insufficient skills and knowledge of the treatment of TMDs compared to practitioners with more experience. These results were consistent with the studies of (SAJJANAR et al 2021) and (Sinclair et al 2022), where the authors reported that required efforts are not put in by the practitioners newer in practice to assess the etiology of TMDs and to diagnose TMDs; they rather decide to not treat the subject and refer them to a higher center or to the specialist that could treat TMDs. However, practitioners with more experience, as in the present study, of 5-10 years or >10 years, owing to more encounters of practitioners with TMDs, require clinicians to treat subjects with TMDs and increase their attendance in CDEs focused on TMDs, increasing their confidence and knowledge in treating subjects with TMDs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…One might possibly suspect the amount of subjects with painful TMD in the SB group. However, in comparison with previous studies, reporting a frequency of painful TMD in individuals diagnosed to have SB of 46.4% or more 19 , 21 , the proportion in the present study appears comparatively low and approximately within the range that was found in the general population 24 . Psychological aspects, such as psychological load, are further possible factors, which may have altered the general pain tolerance.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…In doing so, authors aimed for collecting a more naturalistic sample. As known from the literature 19 , 21 , SB samples included a mean percentage of approximately 50% with a TMD diagnosis. On the second appointment, another trained dentist, blinded to the SB diagnosis, performed the pain-inducing procedures to rule out investigator bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were a total of 1,257 participants in six studies [ 30 - 35 ] that examined the effects of bruxism on TMD. Two of the studies applied the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) [ 30 , 31 ], whereas three of the studies employed the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for the diagnosis of TMD [ 32 , 33 , 35 ]. Several studies examined the effect of bruxism on the TMJ using questionnaires [ 30 , 35 ], self-reports [ 31 , 34 ], and clinical examination results [ 30 , 31 , 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%