2016
DOI: 10.1080/10304312.2016.1231786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporary sobriety initiatives: emergence, possibilities and constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intervention is made by an external agencya charitywho are explicit in their intention to permanently reduce individuals' alcohol consumption. The target population is drinkers broadly and, as with some other TAIs (see Robert, 2016b), the only group specifically advised not to participate are those who may be dependent or addicted to alcohol (Alcohol Concern, 2018). In these respects, the objectives and targets of Dry January mirror those of wider alcohol policy.…”
Section: Dry January Self and Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The intervention is made by an external agencya charitywho are explicit in their intention to permanently reduce individuals' alcohol consumption. The target population is drinkers broadly and, as with some other TAIs (see Robert, 2016b), the only group specifically advised not to participate are those who may be dependent or addicted to alcohol (Alcohol Concern, 2018). In these respects, the objectives and targets of Dry January mirror those of wider alcohol policy.…”
Section: Dry January Self and Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plus, participants in TAIs may not be representative of drinkers in general. Indeed, evidence suggests that moderate drinkers are more likely to participate(Robert, 2016b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TSIs are taken up mostly by segments of the public who are cognizant of the negative social and health effects of alcohol and use the structure and social legitimation of a popular event to make anti-consumption choices (Cherrier & Gurrieri, 2013; Robert, 2016). Thus even those TSIs such as Australia’s Dry July, which conceive of themselves primarily as fundraisers for the charities they support (Dry July, 2016), recognize that participants are often motivated by a desire to change their relationship to alcohol and/or to reduce their drinking as a way to improve their overall health (see also Dry January, 2015; Dry July, 2015, p. 6; FebFast, 2013b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embodied philanthropists in Australia represent a range of demographics, largely depending on the type of participation required and these constraints cut across broader trends in volunteering. Studies of campaigns where participants give up alcohol, for instance, are most popular among women in their 30s and 40s (Robert, ), a finding that aligns with general rates of volunteering. This kind of embodied philanthropy nonetheless excludes segments of the population who do not drink alcohol, such as members of certain religious communities, who often volunteer at higher rates than the general population (Merrill, ; Scaife et al, ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It is reasonable to suspect that embodied philanthropy campaigns compete, at least to some extent, with one another and with more traditional ways of soliciting donations. There are, for instance, three national, month‐long fundraisers predicated on abstaining from alcohol, and few participants sign up for more than one (Robert, ). If and precisely how embodied philanthropy, either as a whole or in particular iterations, detracts from other forms of giving (or volunteering) or whether it reaches audiences not previously engaged in philanthropy is yet to be determined.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%