2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporary short-segment pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures: comparative study with or without vertebroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this present study, there was also a “cohesive” displacement/micro-motion of the bone defect area; however, the change of the oblique angle did not change the displacement/micro-motion of the bone defect area. By the combined use of Schanz pedicle screw and thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthosis (TLSO) brace in our previous study [ 1 ] and the study of Aono et al [ 2 ], we not only ensured the clinical efficacy but also prevented the re-collapse of the injured vertebra. We speculated that TLSO brace could limit the thoracolumbar sacral movement to reduce the injured vertebra displacement and thus avoid the re-collapse of the injured vertebrae [ 1 ]; however, further biomechanical and clinical studies are needed to confirm this statement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this present study, there was also a “cohesive” displacement/micro-motion of the bone defect area; however, the change of the oblique angle did not change the displacement/micro-motion of the bone defect area. By the combined use of Schanz pedicle screw and thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthosis (TLSO) brace in our previous study [ 1 ] and the study of Aono et al [ 2 ], we not only ensured the clinical efficacy but also prevented the re-collapse of the injured vertebra. We speculated that TLSO brace could limit the thoracolumbar sacral movement to reduce the injured vertebra displacement and thus avoid the re-collapse of the injured vertebrae [ 1 ]; however, further biomechanical and clinical studies are needed to confirm this statement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Despite no screw breakage occurred in Schanz pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of severe fracture [ 1 , 2 ], it still has the disadvantages of postoperative re-collapse of the injured vertebra [ 22 ]. Jang et al retrospectively analyzed 208 cases of thoracolumbar burst fracture using conventional open pedicle screw fixation and found that age at operation (> 43 years old) and preoperative body height loss (> 54%) were independent predictors of re-collapse [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Other studies comparing unilateral with bilateral screw fixation showed no difference in using unilateral or bilateral screw fixation. 10 And a large Meta-analysis of 365 patients did not show any difference between short segments as compared to long segment pedicle screw fixation, in our study we utilized the short segment pedicle screw fixation technique for our patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The problem of choosing the surgical approach for such injuries remains unsolved. According to the literature, short-segment transpedicular fixation characterized by a minimal number of blocked spinal-motor segments and low intraoperative blood loss is the gold standard for this type of injury [5][6][7][8]. However, the advantages of such fixation system arrangement are partially offset by the risk of instability of short-segment hardware (almost 54% of cases) and subsequent relapse of post-traumatic kyphotic deformity [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%