2016
DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000000520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporary Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Stabilization Without Fusion of Adolescent Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures

Abstract: Level IV-Retrospective case series.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, blood loss and operation time in the P group were lower than those in the O group. DISH patient with spinal fracture may be a good candidate for PPS fixation because (1) they do not need bone grafting, (2) they do not lose range of motion because segments are already fused by hyperostosis, (3) majority of patients are elderly with general comorbidities, and (4) removal of the spinal implants for the purpose of retrieving the segmental motion 24 is not mandatory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, blood loss and operation time in the P group were lower than those in the O group. DISH patient with spinal fracture may be a good candidate for PPS fixation because (1) they do not need bone grafting, (2) they do not lose range of motion because segments are already fused by hyperostosis, (3) majority of patients are elderly with general comorbidities, and (4) removal of the spinal implants for the purpose of retrieving the segmental motion 24 is not mandatory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…they do not lose range of motion because segments are already fused by hyperostosis, (3) majority of patients are elderly with general comorbidities, and (4) removal of the spinal implants for the purpose of retrieving the segmental motion 24 is not mandatory.…”
Section: Pps Fixation For Thoracolumbar Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increased stiffness renders the region above the fusion site the last mobile segment, thereby leading to degenerative changes and adjacent segment disease [52]. Fusion is therefore avoided when possible, especially in younger populations, due to the increased lifelong risk of adjacent segment disease, or in the pediatric population where the spine must be allowed to grow [53]. In addition, many of the studies showing the inadequacy of spinal instrumentation alone were conducted decades ago, with older, less stable constructs than what is available today [47].…”
Section: Spinal Instrumentation and Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As these ligamentous injuries may not heal effectively, the safety of hardware removal after bony healing may be questioned. However, there is increasing evidence that thoracolumbar injuries with a ruptured PLC may be effectively treated by temporary spinal fixation without fusion, with little to no progressive kyphosis or sagittal imbalance being reported up to 10 years after hardware removal (Figures 8a, 8b) [38,46,53,66,74]. showing no increased kyphosis.…”
Section: Spinal Instrumentation Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yetişkinlerde perkütan tespit uygulamaları ve sonuçları iyi tanımlanmış olsa da çocuk hasta popülasyonda daha fazla çalışmaya ihtiyaç vardır. [32] Teorik olarak enstrümantasyonda kullanılan implantlar, kemik ve bağlar vücudun yükünü taşıyabilecek kadar kuvvetlendiğinde çıkarılabilir ki spontan füzyonu engellemek adına bu süre ortalama 12 aydır (Şekil 2). Anterior füzyon, direkt lateral füzyon ve extreme lateral interbody füzyon diğer cerrahi tedavi seçenekleridir.…”
Section: Cerrahi̇ Tedavi̇ Endi̇kasyonlariunclassified