1989
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1989.0137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporary paralysis of cranial nerves III, IV, and VI after a Gow-Gates injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Isolated cases of temporary paralysis of cranial nerves III, IV, and VI following the Gow-Gates mandibular block have been reported. 14,15 This type of complication may result from omission of careful aspiration and failure to inject the anesthetic solution within the target area. 14 According to Malamed, the solution should not be deposited unless bone (the lateral aspect of the neck of the condyle) is sounded with the needle when administering a Gow-Gates block.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Isolated cases of temporary paralysis of cranial nerves III, IV, and VI following the Gow-Gates mandibular block have been reported. 14,15 This type of complication may result from omission of careful aspiration and failure to inject the anesthetic solution within the target area. 14 According to Malamed, the solution should not be deposited unless bone (the lateral aspect of the neck of the condyle) is sounded with the needle when administering a Gow-Gates block.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Careful aspiration and direction of the needle to an area with fewer large-bore blood vessels such as the lateral aspect of the condyle are recommended to avoid this complication. 18…”
Section: Transient Paralysis Of Combinations Of Cranial Nervesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient’s opinion about the dental treatment is closely related to the local anesthesia experience and the proper use of local anesthesia techniques and pain management are indispensable for successful dental treatment. Although pain control is accomplished successfully in most cases, some anesthesia techniques like mandibular block are accompanied by some drawbacks including difficulty in achieving anesthesia because of anatomic variations; 1 deep and invasive needle penetration; 2,3 paresthesia; 1 muscle trismus; 4 paralysis; 5 transportation of oral microbial flora to anatomic spaces; 6 delayed onset of anesthesia; 7,8 hematom formation; 9 high incidence of positive aspiration; 9 undesired soft and/or hard tissue anesthesia with possible patient-induced injury, 7,10 and difficulty in hemostasis in patients with bleeding disorders. 10,21,24 The inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) is the most commonly used injection technique for achieving local anesthesia for mandibular restorative and surgical procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%