2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40256-013-0059-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporary Adjunctive Cilostazol vs Clopidogrel Loading for ST-segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: There was no significant difference in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events between temporary adjunctive cilostazol treatment and clopidogrel loading in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction patients. Our findings suggest one potential of cilostazol.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is established that several hypotensors, statins and anti-platelet drugs cause renal toxicity, particularly in aged patients with declined renal function. There are several anti-platelet treatments used to prevent stent thrombosis and reduce future ischemic events, aspirin being one important and common anti-platelet therapy (16). As one of the traditional non-steroid, anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin intake may result in renal failure or aggravate renal dysfunction (17,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is established that several hypotensors, statins and anti-platelet drugs cause renal toxicity, particularly in aged patients with declined renal function. There are several anti-platelet treatments used to prevent stent thrombosis and reduce future ischemic events, aspirin being one important and common anti-platelet therapy (16). As one of the traditional non-steroid, anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin intake may result in renal failure or aggravate renal dysfunction (17,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors hypothesized that the substitution of cilostazol for clopidogrel loading in this population would reduce bleeding complications without compromising ischaemic outcomes. In fact, they found no difference in ischaemic or major bleeding outcomes between treatment groups [10]. Based on these data, the authors propose a potential role for cilostazol in the contemporary management of patients undergoing emergent percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…First approved for use in Japan in 1988, it has since been studied in a variety of vascular disorders, including peripheral arterial and cerebrovascular disease, and as an adjunct to existing antiplatelet agents in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. In the current edition of the journal, Tanaka et al [10] propose a novel indication for cilostazol, namely as a substitute for clopidogrel loading in patients presenting with STEMI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, because peripheral arterial disease is frequently associated with coronary artery disease, it is important to investigate whether cilostazol is also cardio protective. Moreover, little information is available to determine the cardio protective effect of adjunctive cilostazol compared with clopidogrel alone in those patients (Tanaka et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%