2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporally downscaling a precipitation intensity factor for soil erosion modeling using the NOAA-ASOS weather station network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The precipitation erosivity in 2050 was significantly greater than that in 2020. Therefore, soil erosion is closely related to precipitation intensity [ 22 , 32 , 33 ]; that is, future climate change is more conducive to the occurrence of soil erosion [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precipitation erosivity in 2050 was significantly greater than that in 2020. Therefore, soil erosion is closely related to precipitation intensity [ 22 , 32 , 33 ]; that is, future climate change is more conducive to the occurrence of soil erosion [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies used climatic probabilistic projections such as the UKCP09 [47] with statistical downscaling, as in the case of Bussi et al [48] or Ciampalini et al [3] over basins of the Great Britain. Weather generators are also frequently used as an alternative method for downscaling data for soil erosion modeling as in Chen et al [49] (i.e., GPCC, The Generator for Point Climate Change), the CLIGEN ("The CLImate GENerator") in Fullhart et al [50] (2020), and many other [51,52]. Lastly, in recent works at a continental scale, Borrelli et al [22,53], inspected rainfall erosivity using 14 GCMs from the WorldClim dataset [54] downscaled at 30 arc-second (~1 km 2 ) matching them as covariates with gauge series observations for present and future to simulate soil erosion over three Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) climatic scenarios, while Panagos et al [55], compared future rainfall erosivity at 30 arc-second obtained by 19 downscaled General Circulation Models (GCMs), over three RCPs for the periods 2041-2060 and 2061-2080 using GloREDa (Global Rainfall Erosivity Database, Panagos et al [56]) with 20 regional studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, to address the relationship between land use and response of soil erosion, Wang Huan et al (2019) carried out quantitative attribution on soil erosion in different geomorphic areas of Sanchahe watershed, which showed that land use had the highest explanatory power for soil erosion, and the soil erosion risk of cultivated land was higher than that of other land use types (Borrelli et al 2017b;Dai et al 2017;Li et al, 2018). Based on the fixed-point monitoring of slope surface, the influence of different rainfall intensity on soil erosion mode is significant (Fullhart et al 2020;Wu et al 2018), and the spatial distribution of soil erosion directly affects the spatial change of soil nutrient loss (Zeng et al 2018). In addition, relevant researches have been carried out on the mechanism of soil erosion (Li et al 2017;Peng and Wang 2012;Shen et al 2008;Wang et al 2013a) , the construction of soil erosion model (Geissen et al 2008;Kheir et al 2010;Liu 2016;Xu et al 2008) and the temporal and spatial variation of soil erosion (He et al 2018;Wang et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%