Temporalis Fascia Graft Perforation and Retraction After Tympanoplasty for Chronic Tubotympanic Otitis and Attic Retraction Pockets

Jesić, S; Dimitrijević, Mirjana; Nešić, Vladimir; Jotić, Ana; Slijepčević, Nikola

doi:10.1001/archoto.2010.242

Cited by 19 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fascia graft was avoided due to poor outcome results in cases of the presence of coexisting attic retraction, as it had been shown in our previous study (13). Fascia graft was avoided due to poor outcome results in cases of the presence of coexisting attic retraction, as it had been shown in our previous study (13).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 68%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Pars Tensa Retractions Without Cholesteatoma in Children

Jesić

Rovcanin

Jovicevic

et al. 2014

Otology &Amp; Neurotology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 68%

“…According to our previous study, LAR itself does not decrease the incidence of postoperative retraction of the fascia graft in retracted children ears (13). In the majority of cases, LAR was performed for attic retraction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 85%

Pars Tensa Retractions Without Cholesteatoma in Children

Jesić

Rovcanin

Jovicevic

et al. 2014

Otology &Amp; Neurotology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…10,11 The increased stiffness of cartilage makes it less prone to retraction and reperforation. 12,13 Initial claims about worse ABG closure using cartilage were not confirmed in a recent large meta-analysis, which showed similar audiometric outcomes compared to fascia tympanoplasty. 14 Studies have also shown the advantages of higher graft integration rate in cartilage tympanoplasty compared to temporalis fascia grafting alone.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

En Hamac tympanoplasty and canalplasty for optimal type 1 tympanoplasty outcomes

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Multiple tympanoplasty techniques have been developed with numerous differences in grafting and approach. This study aimed to improve type 1 tympanoplasty outcomes by using the ‘en hamac’ technique as well as performing a complete canalplasty for anterior perforations. Method A retrospective review was performed using the prospective Otology-Neurotology Database tool for otological surgery. All primary type 1 tympanoplasty cases performed for tympanic membrane perforations from 2010 to 2016 were selected for analysis, all performed by one author. Minimal clinical and audiometric follow up was 18 months. Results Tympanic membrane perforation closure was achieved in 62 of the patients (96.88 per cent). None of the en hamac cases had residual or recurrent perforation (p = 0.02). The mean remaining air–bone gap was 8.50 dB. The remaining air–bone gap was less than 10 dB in 72.55 per cent, 10–20 dB in 25.49 per cent and more than 20 dB in 1.96 per cent. Conclusion Using the en hamac technique for anterior perforations as well as systematically performing a complete canalplasty provides multiple surgical advantages with excellent post-operative results.

show abstract

“…In patients with chronic otitis media (COM) or other diseases associated with eustachian tube dysfunction, the negative middle ear pressure increases the chance of retraction and perforation of the (replaced) TM. A recent study in a tertiary referral center population of 270 ears reported recurrent perforation in 13.9% of adults with COM undergoing TF tympanoplasty, compared to only 2.0% of adults without COM …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%